AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

We're up to Build 0082.  This new major release of the AccuRender and nXt product line now includes a plugin that works entirely within AutoCAD just like previous versions. It's got a ton of new features and is available for free for a while.  Take a look and let me know what you think.

See the Download->AccuRender Studio menu items for more details.

Views: 660

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Is there going to be the option of using ies files?

I think so-- that would also work for this.

I posted 0086, which changes the light distribution somewhat-- so that 25% of the light is distributed diffusely (beam angle = 120) and the rest at the specified beam angle.  The results seem to be pretty good-- I'll make this user configurable if I can figure out how to explain it to people.

Call it "Diffuse Glow" and make it a tick box on the light setup dialog box.

I forgot to mention window glass properties that will negatively impact performance--

  • Not using the Thin checkbox and modeling glass as a solid
  • Using a bump map of any kind
  • Using surface roughness

It's fine to do all of the above when you need to.  They all work, they just take a little longer to converge.

The Farm is now working.

This one ran for 40 minutes (80 cores).

Will there be an option for running renderings for a certain number of passes rather than by time?


I can certainly add passes as a constraint.  I did this to keep it consistent with the cloud stuff, where I won't be adding passes since everyone is billed by time. Passes, BTW, are called Samples per Pixel in the Image Editor.  You can check that number to see what's reasonable (which may be significantly different than past engines.)

Check out a product called Neat Image when you get a chance.  It does a really nice job removing residual noise. 

Something has gone wrong with the direction of lights.

I set it to 0,0,-1 and it keeps reverting to 0,0,0 and no light is being emitted from the source.

Okay, I've changed it to "Down" which seems to work.

I'll check into this. I may ask for additional steps to recreate.

0087 should take care of this.

Here's a direct comparison between nXt and Studio with all the correct settings.

nXt ran for just over 22 minutes with 2000 passes.

Studio ran for 23 minutes with 6443 samples.

My two concerns are: the graininess of the image and the jagged outline round the lights.




Latest Activity

Rich Hart replied to Hauke's discussion No Material
"I am not sure how to proceed. Perhaps send me a new model and xref to try here, to see if I can duplicate this."
Hauke replied to Hauke's discussion No Material
"... both are checked. Object Color was shown but no material."
Rich Hart replied to Hauke's discussion No Material
"I get a material and a color to show up. Make sure Use Materials and Use Colors is checked:"
Hauke replied to Hauke's discussion No Material
"Hi again, my problem was not solved before. Meanwhile I worked without Xrefs and there was no time to try out other solutions. Now I have to work again with Xrefs and there is the same Problem in the latest version. I checked the license and it…"
Jan Verzelen commented on Jan Verzelen's photo


"sorry guys, i should visit this forum more often. Thanks for the feedback. "
Mar 13
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio for AutoCAD
"No plans yet.  The new stuff is being designed to be much easier to port.  If I go that way, the first target will likely be Rhino for the Mac."
Mar 12
charlie baker replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio for AutoCAD
"I've just been looking at a video fly round I built in 2003 on Accurender. It's great to see it's back. I don't suppose by the slimmest of chance you're going to build it to fit into the AutoCAD for Mac version are you?…"
Mar 12
Andrew Uno replied to Andrew Uno's discussion nXt Render Farmer - Question
"Will do what I can to see if I can isolate a model, I've got one drawing we were going to use in our digital catalog that ultimately has been bypassed due to it continually being problematic, I think it would be a good jumping off point for the…"
Mar 5

© 2018   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service