AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

My new computer came with a Quadro 4000 graphics card.

Is there any way of utilizing the GPU capabilities to speed rendering up?

Views: 1282

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

using other rendering engine, ha ha........

Yes, there is. Try: Octane Render, Blender Cycles, Small LUX GPU, V-Ray RT, Indigo RT, Bunkspeed, Maxwell, Thea ..... :D

maxwell and vray is cpu rendering only

V-Ray RT with GPU support:

http://chaosgroup.com/en/2/vrayrt.html

Maxwell indeed has real time preview, but still, it is only CPU based.

VRAY RT...REAL TIME PRODUCTION...

None of the mentioned renderers are for use in AutoCAD. They are in majority stand-alone rendering suites with advanced connection plugins for the most popular 3D software programs like Maya, 3D Studio Max, Rhino 3D, Sketchup, Blender.... etc.

One of the best of Vray 2.0 is that you can use "Vray RT" as output, ie you can use the same parameters also Vray for RT, either CPU or GPU, this is a great advantage.
Picture this for animations, it is now a reality

vray in Max example...

vray using gpu is for display only, not for production

Hmm, not quite the answers I was looking for.

It's not a problem, it just seems a shame to have all that processing power sitting around doing nothing.

GPU seems to be very usefull when moving into the walkabout window. But it takes a cofee when rendering...

Still in a wait and see mode re: GPU for the type of rendering we do, but not particularly optimistic.  So far, despite all of the advertising hype, the results for others have been very mixed when doing things like Path Tracing.  

A GPU is a very different computer than a CPU, and the way the code is written changes drastically.  In the case of your 12 core machine, it would almost certainly be a case of either/or-- the GPU would have to substitute for not supplement the CPU.  Your case would be the least likely of all to show any significant improvement.

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

heyuan replied to heyuan's discussion HOW TO HAVE THIS EFFECT BY NXT RENDERING?
"I have received the email file, thank you!"
3 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"I'll take a look at it."
7 hours ago
Garret Diduck replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"Slightly off topic, but can we have the option of the Hybrid in the Plant Editor?"
7 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"My point is that it may be faster if you use another engine-- try the Hybrid."
7 hours ago
Maciej replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"George, I used to use RPCs, but unfortunately last time I have some problems to install this software. I'll try again anyway. Looks it really could help. "
9 hours ago
Maciej replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"I use standard. As far as my experience is concerned, for my purposes is more than sufficient. The point is I need more views, and this I sent was just a "bonus" for the client. The developer was asked to show the landscape impact, and…"
9 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"Which engine?  The performance hit for using trees with the Hybrid (or Path Tracer) engine is smaller-- perhaps worth a try."
9 hours ago
George Ioannidis replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"I think there isn't a rule of thumb for your question, Maciej. It mostly depends on what you are trying to achieve. As I can see, your rendering is aerial picture taken from bird's perspective, i.e. from very long distance. Any detailed…"
9 hours ago

© 2014   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service