Large format images - AccuRender nXt2024-03-29T12:57:13Zhttp://accurender.ning.com/forum/topics/large-format-images?feed=yes&xn_auth=noI am going to try 4800 to see…tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-05-14:6293855:Comment:1153742015-05-14T18:14:59.481Zmiguel martinezhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/miguelmartinez
<p>I am going to try 4800 to see how it goes.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>I am going to try 4800 to see how it goes.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p> for 8' x 8;, try 50 DPI (4,80…tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-05-14:6293855:Comment:1156012015-05-14T17:24:45.326ZAlbert D Harthttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/AlbertDHart
<p>for 8' x 8;, try <span>50 DPI (4,800 x 4,800) or 75 DPI (7,200 x 7,200)</span></p>
<p></p>
<p>I would expect 2400 pixels (just 25 pixels per inch on paper to be too low a resolution)</p>
<p></p>
<p>If you have enough RAM, 7,2000 x 7,200 should take about about 14 times longer per pass. But, especially for a test, you can render just 5 or 10 passes to see what the quality looks like and then add more passes later when you are sure what resolution you want to use.</p>
<p>for 8' x 8;, try <span>50 DPI (4,800 x 4,800) or 75 DPI (7,200 x 7,200)</span></p>
<p></p>
<p>I would expect 2400 pixels (just 25 pixels per inch on paper to be too low a resolution)</p>
<p></p>
<p>If you have enough RAM, 7,2000 x 7,200 should take about about 14 times longer per pass. But, especially for a test, you can render just 5 or 10 passes to see what the quality looks like and then add more passes later when you are sure what resolution you want to use.</p> 8 feet by 8 feet. It does not…tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-05-14:6293855:Comment:1155042015-05-14T16:47:22.866Zmiguel martinezhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/miguelmartinez
<p>8 feet by 8 feet. It does not define very well shadows. It is blurry in the edges.</p>
<p>8 feet by 8 feet. It does not define very well shadows. It is blurry in the edges.</p> How large did you print the 2…tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-05-14:6293855:Comment:1151632015-05-14T04:26:49.474ZAlbert D Harthttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/AlbertDHart
<p>How large did you print the 2400 x 1600 image?</p>
<p>How large did you print the 2400 x 1600 image?</p> tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-05-13:6293855:Comment:1152902015-05-13T22:07:57.155Zmiguel martinezhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/miguelmartinez
<p><a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/55262705?profile=original" target="_self"><img width="546" class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/55262705?profile=original"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/55262705?profile=original" target="_self"><img width="546" class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/55262705?profile=original"/></a></p> I have a 2400x1600 resolution…tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-05-13:6293855:Comment:1153682015-05-13T21:10:43.165Zmiguel martinezhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/miguelmartinez
<p>I have a 2400x1600 resolution with 100 pases and it is blurry when printed in large format. I will try to work on tiles.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
<p></p>
<p>I have a 2400x1600 resolution with 100 pases and it is blurry when printed in large format. I will try to work on tiles.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
<p></p> Try not to go over 50 DPI (4,…tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-05-13:6293855:Comment:1152872015-05-13T20:25:47.760ZAlbert D Harthttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/AlbertDHart
<p>Try not to go over 50 DPI (4,800 x 4,800) or 75 DPI (7,200 x 7,200)</p>
<p>Make a 8" x 8", (small), test image by rendering at 400 x 400 or 600 x 600 and check the print quality on your photo printer, (or 5" x 7" at similar resolutions), I think you'll find that one of these resolutions will work for the larger image.</p>
<p>You should be able to render these sizes if you have enough RAM.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Of, course, the other option is to render just 1/4 of the screen at a time, and stitch…</p>
<p>Try not to go over 50 DPI (4,800 x 4,800) or 75 DPI (7,200 x 7,200)</p>
<p>Make a 8" x 8", (small), test image by rendering at 400 x 400 or 600 x 600 and check the print quality on your photo printer, (or 5" x 7" at similar resolutions), I think you'll find that one of these resolutions will work for the larger image.</p>
<p>You should be able to render these sizes if you have enough RAM.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Of, course, the other option is to render just 1/4 of the screen at a time, and stitch the images together.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Does anyone have any experience with this?</p>