AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

pls am trying to do a presentation on two of our factories and am using  textures as the roof of the factory, i want to ask about the scale of the texture x = 7000 y =7000 hope is not to much or there is anything am doing wrong? bcos that scale make it more visible.

Views: 367

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I have no idea what you're asking.  The texture map itself is terrible. It has a seam and one ridge that's larger than the others.  There's nothing wrong with using a scale of 7 meters x 7 meters,  but it's certainly unrealistically large for metal roofing.  The space between ridges works out to more than 1 meter in your example.
Try these.
Attachments:
i tried all yur materials but did not assign and cannot find it in the texture edit? may be there is something wrong with the files.
Banjoko's right-- your textures are not embedded.
So What am I doing wrong?
I'm not sure-- try writing out the material called Long Span Green and see what you get.  The file size should reflect the embedded textures.
These are the textures.
Attachments:
Basicamente tienes un problema de escalas. Lo unico qeu modifique es la dimension de tu mapa, para esto tome en consideracion qeu cada canal de la lamina tendria unos 30 cm, por lo cual 5 canales qeu es mas o menos lo qeu esta representado tendrian 1.5 mts (1500 ml). Ya con esto tu mapa qeuda mas o menos correcto. te recomiendo tener lo mas exacto posible la dimension de tus canales para poder obtener un mejor resultado
Try this
Attachments:
I have downloaded this, it shows fine in thumbnail mode but renders blank. Am I doing something wrong?
Bitmaps are not embedded.  Marc will have to upload a new version and embed the texture.

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

akinlolu olugboji commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

view 002 mx2

"Good catch."
14 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Albert D Hart's discussion Fractal Trees vs Images for trees
"nXt doesn't really work like that-- all of the objects need to be taken.  An object which is hidden from view may show up in a reflection, a shadow, refracted through glass, contribute to diffuse reflection of light in the scene, etc..…"
15 hours ago
George Ioannidis commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

view 002 mx2

"One oddity: nice green leaves of summer together with some melting snow islands on the grass and elsewhere. Except the tree is some kind of evergreen which I can't recognize. ;)"
yesterday
Steve Wojtynek replied to Albert D Hart's discussion Fractal Trees vs Images for trees
"Sounds like good method... something I need to look into as I've never used tree images. Assuming I want to continue working the old way using only fractal trees... Does AutoCAD and AccuRender take time to calculate trees hidden by buildings…"
yesterday
kingjin commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

view 002 mx2

"Maciej, hello, very good results, and ask how to get the car? THX."
yesterday
Albert D Hart posted a discussion

Fractal Trees vs Images for trees

"I'm usually rendering fairly detailed AutoCAD architectural models on 3Dmodeled sites with lots of AccuRender trees and shrubs.  I was wonderingwhat AccuRender 4 (using Acad2004) and AccuRender nXt (using Acad2011)actually "sees" when you select a view to render.  Do they "see" and have to"consider" the 50 trees behind the building (adding a lot of calculatingtime to a rendering), or do these programs "hide" and never consider thestuff that's hidden in a view by other entities?"Everything in th…See More
Sunday
Maciej posted photos
Saturday
J. Raul Cardenas replied to J. Raul Cardenas's discussion Render Settings
"8.6 MPixels is a lot indeed, specially in rendering time. Thanks a lot for the explanation, makes sense now."
May 19

© 2015   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service