AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

pls am trying to do a presentation on two of our factories and am using  textures as the roof of the factory, i want to ask about the scale of the texture x = 7000 y =7000 hope is not to much or there is anything am doing wrong? bcos that scale make it more visible.

Views: 343

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I have no idea what you're asking.  The texture map itself is terrible. It has a seam and one ridge that's larger than the others.  There's nothing wrong with using a scale of 7 meters x 7 meters,  but it's certainly unrealistically large for metal roofing.  The space between ridges works out to more than 1 meter in your example.
Try these.
Attachments:
i tried all yur materials but did not assign and cannot find it in the texture edit? may be there is something wrong with the files.
Banjoko's right-- your textures are not embedded.
So What am I doing wrong?
I'm not sure-- try writing out the material called Long Span Green and see what you get.  The file size should reflect the embedded textures.
These are the textures.
Attachments:
Basicamente tienes un problema de escalas. Lo unico qeu modifique es la dimension de tu mapa, para esto tome en consideracion qeu cada canal de la lamina tendria unos 30 cm, por lo cual 5 canales qeu es mas o menos lo qeu esta representado tendrian 1.5 mts (1500 ml). Ya con esto tu mapa qeuda mas o menos correcto. te recomiendo tener lo mas exacto posible la dimension de tus canales para poder obtener un mejor resultado
Try this
Attachments:
I have downloaded this, it shows fine in thumbnail mode but renders blank. Am I doing something wrong?
Bitmaps are not embedded.  Marc will have to upload a new version and embed the texture.

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

heyuan replied to heyuan's discussion HOW TO HAVE THIS EFFECT BY NXT RENDERING?
"I have received the email file, thank you!"
7 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"I'll take a look at it."
10 hours ago
Garret Diduck replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"Slightly off topic, but can we have the option of the Hybrid in the Plant Editor?"
11 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"My point is that it may be faster if you use another engine-- try the Hybrid."
11 hours ago
Maciej replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"George, I used to use RPCs, but unfortunately last time I have some problems to install this software. I'll try again anyway. Looks it really could help. "
12 hours ago
Maciej replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"I use standard. As far as my experience is concerned, for my purposes is more than sufficient. The point is I need more views, and this I sent was just a "bonus" for the client. The developer was asked to show the landscape impact, and…"
13 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"Which engine?  The performance hit for using trees with the Hybrid (or Path Tracer) engine is smaller-- perhaps worth a try."
13 hours ago
George Ioannidis replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"I think there isn't a rule of thumb for your question, Maciej. It mostly depends on what you are trying to achieve. As I can see, your rendering is aerial picture taken from bird's perspective, i.e. from very long distance. Any detailed…"
13 hours ago

© 2014   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service