AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

pls am trying to do a presentation on two of our factories and am using  textures as the roof of the factory, i want to ask about the scale of the texture x = 7000 y =7000 hope is not to much or there is anything am doing wrong? bcos that scale make it more visible.

Views: 343

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I have no idea what you're asking.  The texture map itself is terrible. It has a seam and one ridge that's larger than the others.  There's nothing wrong with using a scale of 7 meters x 7 meters,  but it's certainly unrealistically large for metal roofing.  The space between ridges works out to more than 1 meter in your example.
Try these.
Attachments:
i tried all yur materials but did not assign and cannot find it in the texture edit? may be there is something wrong with the files.
Banjoko's right-- your textures are not embedded.
So What am I doing wrong?
I'm not sure-- try writing out the material called Long Span Green and see what you get.  The file size should reflect the embedded textures.
These are the textures.
Attachments:
Basicamente tienes un problema de escalas. Lo unico qeu modifique es la dimension de tu mapa, para esto tome en consideracion qeu cada canal de la lamina tendria unos 30 cm, por lo cual 5 canales qeu es mas o menos lo qeu esta representado tendrian 1.5 mts (1500 ml). Ya con esto tu mapa qeuda mas o menos correcto. te recomiendo tener lo mas exacto posible la dimension de tus canales para poder obtener un mejor resultado
Try this
Attachments:
I have downloaded this, it shows fine in thumbnail mode but renders blank. Am I doing something wrong?
Bitmaps are not embedded.  Marc will have to upload a new version and embed the texture.

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion Latest Render Farm update
"Just installed the thing on a Microsoft Surface Pro without much on it-- getting the same side x side error with the Farm Monitor so I probably don't need you to run depends on that one.  My farmer (nxtfarmer64.exe and nxt64.exe) does…"
8 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion Latest Render Farm update
"Thanks-- in the meantime I'm going to try installing the thing on a machine here-- then I'll have Scott at McNeel install onto a clean machine over there."
8 hours ago
Peter Milner replied to Peter Milner's discussion Latest Render Farm update
"Not a problem.  I'll do it tomorrow as I have a stack of renderings running at the moment."
8 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion Latest Render Farm update
"If you get a chance-- but I'm 99% sure it will run on the main machine.   Something is missing from the installer that is present on your main machine.  The reason it's on the main machine is very likely due to other software…"
8 hours ago
Peter Milner replied to Peter Milner's discussion Latest Render Farm update
"Spot on. The old and new farm monitors both work on my main machine. I'm not sure if the new farmer does though. If you like, I can test it. "
8 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion Latest Render Farm update
"That's wise-- so if I'm understanding things-- The Farm Monitor, whether old or new, does not run on the node you tried. The new Farmer does not run on node, the old one does. The old Farm Monitor runs on your main machine. Is this…"
8 hours ago
Peter Milner replied to Peter Milner's discussion Latest Render Farm update
"I was going to, but when I found it didn't launch on the first one, I stopped there."
9 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion Latest Render Farm update
"I may need your help to debug this one-- a quick look at the installer doesn't show any problems.  I'll investigate a bit more this morning. You did actually run the installer on all of the machines, right?"
9 hours ago

© 2014   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service