AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

hola necesitaria trabajar mas rapido , tengo una maquina

amd x6  2.8 con 4 gb , mi pregunta es:

1: como tendria que hacer para poner 2 o 3 maquinas trabajando en red

2 : cual es es costo

3 : si en todas las maquinas tienen que estar instaladas las bliblotecas de texturas o solo en la principal,

4 : cual es  la mejor recomendacion de equipo y que  cantidad de memoria para la o las maquinas

5 : si la velocidad se directamente proporcional a la cantidad de equipos ...osea 2 equipos = mitad de tiempo

6 : si es como pienso ya que la traduccion no es del todo fiel , que una misma imagen la procesan varios equipos a la vez

7 : si es asi que pasa si algunas de las maquina se cuelga, si las otras siguen prosesando normalmente esa misma imagen

pd espero poder entendernos

Views: 62

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

There isn't a definitive answer to most of these-- you'll need to experiment.  You get a two-node farm for free, so you can try with that.  For more, you'll need to purchase a render farm license (I don't remember how much it is-- but not very much.)  In general, if you mix fast and slow machines on the network you won't get very good results.  The rule of thumb for performance (# of cores X clock speed) still holds-- but the farm does depend (also) on the speed of your network and how much data you're sending around.  You shouldn't need to have materials or other libraries installed on the nodes-- the package it sends around for rendering should be completely self-contained.  

 

************

 

The render farm generally works pretty well-- although I might suggest waiting for my next update (this weekend?) since I haven't updated the farm in a while.  The results should be consistent.  The farm should be pretty robust if machines are crashing, although that shouldn't be happening anyway.

 

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Kevin Lockwood replied to Barry Hayden's discussion Visible Light Paths?
"On a small scale using Path Tracer and Fog"
13 hours ago
Rich Hart replied to Peter Milner's discussion Large render
"We posted a new version with the fix for this. version 0349-AO30 http://nxtrender.com/download/?utm_medium=download_tab Please try that."
20 hours ago
Rich Hart replied to Peter Milner's discussion Large render
"I'll let you know when we get a new version ready."
yesterday
Rich Hart replied to J. Brown's discussion materials list by layer
"We can add that feature."
yesterday
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion Large render
"Something's up with the Renderplus servers.  They'll announce the build when it's ready."
yesterday
Peter Milner replied to Peter Milner's discussion Large render
"That's great news. The link to the download page seems to be broken at the moment. I'll let you know, as soon as I get hold of the latest build, if it works with the big file."
yesterday
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to J. Brown's discussion materials list by layer
"I don't think so-- but you can ask the guys at Render Plus for this feature.  It isn't hard to implement."
yesterday
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion Large render
"Found and fixed (I think).  Render plus should be able to get a build out ASAP.  It will be 349. There are still a few pixels messed up in the smaller of the two files-- don't know why but it's an unrelated problem and should be…"
yesterday

© 2015   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service