New Build (229) - AccuRender nXt2024-03-28T23:14:40Zhttp://accurender.ning.com/forum/topics/new-build-229?commentId=6293855%3AComment%3A2498&feed=yes&xn_auth=noScaling should work fine. Som…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-09-24:6293855:Comment:26052010-09-24T16:05:40.000ZRoy Hirshkowitzhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/RoyHirshkowitz
Scaling should work fine. Something's up when that happens-- it's probably the RPC app itself-- it may not even be loaded-- but perhaps something on my end. Sometimes a little electro-shock therapy helps, like typing "render" first, then running nXt.
Scaling should work fine. Something's up when that happens-- it's probably the RPC app itself-- it may not even be loaded-- but perhaps something on my end. Sometimes a little electro-shock therapy helps, like typing "render" first, then running nXt. Last build I had the same rep…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-09-24:6293855:Comment:25962010-09-24T15:36:28.000ZKevin Lockwoodhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/KSL
Last build I had the same repeating image issue with RPCs as qweqwi shows. My camera angle nearly straight on. I may have scaled it and figured that scaled RPC's don't work
Last build I had the same repeating image issue with RPCs as qweqwi shows. My camera angle nearly straight on. I may have scaled it and figured that scaled RPC's don't work Yestag:accurender.ning.com,2010-09-24:6293855:Comment:25942010-09-24T15:27:10.000ZRoy Hirshkowitzhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/RoyHirshkowitz
Yes
Yes I don't have any open issues…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-09-24:6293855:Comment:25922010-09-24T15:26:48.000ZRoy Hirshkowitzhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/RoyHirshkowitz
I don't have any open issues re: RPCs right now. If you've got an example of something that isn't working, I'll need to have a look at the model.
I don't have any open issues re: RPCs right now. If you've got an example of something that isn't working, I'll need to have a look at the model. At this angle greater than 45…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-09-24:6293855:Comment:25072010-09-24T10:45:55.000Zakinlolu olugbojihttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/akinloluolugboji
At this angle greater than 45 degrees I do beilieve the RPC's will show well unless they are the parking lot set of cars.<br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><img width="721" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/55256103?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" alt=""/></p>
At this angle greater than 45 degrees I do beilieve the RPC's will show well unless they are the parking lot set of cars.<br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><img width="721" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/55256103?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" alt=""/></p> in spanish ...ok...but rpcs ?…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-09-24:6293855:Comment:24982010-09-24T10:05:34.000Zqweqwihttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/qweqwi
in spanish ...ok...but rpcs ?????<p style="text-align: left;"><img width="721" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/55256059?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" alt=""/></p>
in spanish ...ok...but rpcs ?????<p style="text-align: left;"><img width="721" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/55256059?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024" alt=""/></p> Build 228 was intentionally s…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-09-24:6293855:Comment:24892010-09-24T06:26:52.000ZGeorge Ioannidishttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/GeorgeIoannidis
Build 228 was intentionally skipped?
Build 228 was intentionally skipped?