AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Hola Todos
Necesito una ayuda para elegir un pc a comprar
Quiciera saber si un procesador de 4 cores y 3.2 g Ghz puede ser mejor
que uno de 8 Cores con 2.0 Ghz
Pues me estan cotizando estas dos opciones
XEON E5-2643 de 4 Cores 3.2 Ghz y
XEON E5-2650 de 8 Cores 2.0 Ghz
Quiciera saber si tener menos Ghz significaria que el procesador tiene menor rendimiento . o si por el contrario al tener mas cores tiene un mejor rendiniento

Muchas Gracias
(Traduccion de google)

Hello All
I need help in choosing a pc to buy
I would love for to know if a 4-cores processor and 3.2 g Ghz can be better
to one with 8-cores and 2.0 Ghz
For me these two options are trading
XEON E5-2643 4-core 3.2 Ghz and
XEON E5-2650 8-core 2.0 Ghz
I would love for having less Ghz know if it would mean that the processor has lower performance. or, on the contrary to have more cores is better rendiniento

many Thanks

Views: 124

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Both are important-- multiply clock speed by # of processors to get an estimate for comparison.

These two machines should be pretty similar in performance.  The 8-core may be slightly faster for rendering.  The 4 core will likely be faster for everything else.

Thanks Roy
any more question for large assembly Autocad or Autocad Plant 3d Files How Pc is better?

Video cards can make a big difference when working with large drawings in AutoCAD-- this is not important for rendering in nXt (except for WalkAbout).




Latest Activity

George Ioannidis commented on Peter Milner's photo

screend brochure 2019 05

"Those are all exceptional work, Peter! Congratulations!On this one only: bricks look big to me, but maybe I am wrong. Also some areas in shadow look still a bit noisy."
Peter Milner posted photos
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio for AutoCAD
"1-  On the Rendering Tab there is a popdown called Destination.  The option is called something like "Local Out of Process".  2-  No, installation will require admin access."
Oct 5
Mark Brinkman replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio for AutoCAD
"I am an old Accurender user. I now need to try and re-create some old images from old models. (about 20 years old) I have now downloaded Accurender Studio, and now work with AutoCAD 2016 and 2017 I have 2 questions related to Accurender Studio: 1)…"
Oct 4
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion AR Studio ground plane
"Yep-- the groundplane in ArStudio should be turned on in that case-- but you will get a rectangle which may need to be sized.  If it's not turning on, that's probably a bug."
Sep 26
Peter Milner replied to Peter Milner's discussion AR Studio ground plane
"Not to worry. I've just seen that ArStudio has its own version of a ground plane. It just doesn't translate the old nXt one."
Sep 26
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion AR Studio ground plane
"Sorry-- just got back into town last night.  Infinite objects aren't supported in ArStudio-- so yes-- the ground plane has to be represented by a finite object, in this case a rectangle.  You don't have to use mine, you can use…"
Sep 25
mike makki commented on Tibor K. Karsai's photo

WestlakeV - Copy

"good image and nice montage... the only thing is that the sky is too blue ... a light colour and would make it perfect"
Sep 21

© 2019   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service