Photographer's controls? - AccuRender nXt2024-03-28T19:00:19Zhttp://accurender.ning.com/forum/topics/photographers-controls?commentId=6293855%3AComment%3A4149&xg_raw_resources=1&feed=yes&xn_auth=noNope-- it's trivial. It's als…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-10:6293855:Comment:42092010-10-10T16:39:44.000ZRoy Hirshkowitzhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/RoyHirshkowitz
Nope-- it's trivial. It's also not going to happen.
Nope-- it's trivial. It's also not going to happen. Maybe we are the last "analog…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-10:6293855:Comment:42082010-10-10T16:16:38.000ZGeorge Ioannidishttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/GeorgeIoannidis
Maybe we are the last "analog camera dinosaurs" still alive, Marc :-)
Maybe we are the last "analog camera dinosaurs" still alive, Marc :-) So, but I find that working w…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-10:6293855:Comment:41982010-10-10T12:00:40.000ZMarc Chaumierhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/MarcChaumier
So, but I find that working with camera LENS is more confortable, and usefull than with FOV. In real life we talk about the lens, and never about FOV. Is it a big work to change or to add this setting?
So, but I find that working with camera LENS is more confortable, and usefull than with FOV. In real life we talk about the lens, and never about FOV. Is it a big work to change or to add this setting? Thanks, Roy.tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-08:6293855:Comment:41492010-10-08T18:12:37.000ZGeorge Ioannidishttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/GeorgeIoannidis
Thanks, Roy.
Thanks, Roy. It's a lot of work for not mu…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-08:6293855:Comment:41482010-10-08T18:06:37.000ZRoy Hirshkowitzhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/RoyHirshkowitz
It's a lot of work for not much payback.<br />
<br />
Many of the traditional film-based stuff such as ISO #'s and dark room techniques are going away as digital photography progresses (we're not too far away from very large latitude photo-receptors that should be able to capture HDR directly without bracketing.)<br />
<br />
Any of these things can certainly be modeled-- but fewer and fewer of our users will really understand how these work anyway. For example, the relationship of Depth of Field to the dimension of…
It's a lot of work for not much payback.<br />
<br />
Many of the traditional film-based stuff such as ISO #'s and dark room techniques are going away as digital photography progresses (we're not too far away from very large latitude photo-receptors that should be able to capture HDR directly without bracketing.)<br />
<br />
Any of these things can certainly be modeled-- but fewer and fewer of our users will really understand how these work anyway. For example, the relationship of Depth of Field to the dimension of the film, the lens length, the fstop is very complex and difficult to predict even for a knowledgable photographer. Most of our users will have no idea how to use these. Hmm, clear and laconic answer…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-08:6293855:Comment:41462010-10-08T17:59:50.000ZGeorge Ioannidishttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/GeorgeIoannidis
Hmm, clear and laconic answer :)<br />
And why is that, if I may ask?
Hmm, clear and laconic answer :)<br />
And why is that, if I may ask? Nope.tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-08:6293855:Comment:41432010-10-08T17:53:37.000ZRoy Hirshkowitzhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/RoyHirshkowitz
Nope.
Nope.