Sample interior - AccuRender nXt2024-03-28T12:32:23Zhttp://accurender.ning.com/forum/topics/sample-interior?commentId=6293855%3AComment%3A5458&x=1&feed=yes&xn_auth=noI know, i also use PS a lot,…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-22:6293855:Comment:54582010-10-22T10:52:09.000ZJan Verzelenhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/janverzelen
I know, i also use PS a lot, and i don't have a "cheating" feeling to. But i have somekind of a crooked way of thinking that the only way to get the most realistic result is by using accurender on it's own. As i mentioned before, it doesn't make sense.
I know, i also use PS a lot, and i don't have a "cheating" feeling to. But i have somekind of a crooked way of thinking that the only way to get the most realistic result is by using accurender on it's own. As i mentioned before, it doesn't make sense. I only used Photoshop to add…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-22:6293855:Comment:54282010-10-22T08:41:16.000ZPeter Milnerhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/PeterMilner
I only used Photoshop to add the background and a bit of glare.<br />
<br />
Roy has added this new background HDRI thing which I'm keen to try out.<br />
Glare can be added in the AR editor but it comes out rather pixelated. Hopefully this can be fixed sometime.<br />
<br />
I don't think of using Photoshop as cheating. How many people print digital photos straight from the camera? I suspect most will enhance the picture first either on the computer or even in the camera.<br />
There isn't a single image in any printed…
I only used Photoshop to add the background and a bit of glare.<br />
<br />
Roy has added this new background HDRI thing which I'm keen to try out.<br />
Glare can be added in the AR editor but it comes out rather pixelated. Hopefully this can be fixed sometime.<br />
<br />
I don't think of using Photoshop as cheating. How many people print digital photos straight from the camera? I suspect most will enhance the picture first either on the computer or even in the camera.<br />
There isn't a single image in any printed publication that hasn't had some adjustment. So if we don't expect a camera to take the perfect picture, why should we expect AR to produce the perfect render?<br />
<br />
nXt images need far less adjusting than AR4 images (I used to spend hours fixing artefacts).<br />
<br />
Peter i know this doesn't make sens…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-21:6293855:Comment:53792010-10-21T21:20:51.000ZJan Verzelenhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/janverzelen
i know this doesn't make sense but for me the challenge is always not to use PS if possible
i know this doesn't make sense but for me the challenge is always not to use PS if possible The downloaded DWG file is ab…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-21:6293855:Comment:53762010-10-21T20:53:02.000ZEric Bhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/EricB
The downloaded DWG file is about 200,000 bytes larger, it appears to be the 2007 version. AutoCAD says it is in 2007 format.<br/>
Just opened it in 2008 and all appears to work.<br/>
<br/>
(I like to see how things are modeled - knowing just how much detail is needed to get the idea across is a difficult skill to master - well done Peter)<br/>
<br/>
I wonder if the scene could be rendered that way <u><b>without</b></u> Photoshop?
The downloaded DWG file is about 200,000 bytes larger, it appears to be the 2007 version. AutoCAD says it is in 2007 format.<br/>
Just opened it in 2008 and all appears to work.<br/>
<br/>
(I like to see how things are modeled - knowing just how much detail is needed to get the idea across is a difficult skill to master - well done Peter)<br/>
<br/>
I wonder if the scene could be rendered that way <u><b>without</b></u> Photoshop? Thanks Peter, Roy, this versi…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-21:6293855:Comment:52802010-10-21T15:04:50.000ZMark Linnemannhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/MarkLinnemann
Thanks Peter, Roy, this version opens fine. Now lets see if I can produced stuff this good (not likely :) )
Thanks Peter, Roy, this version opens fine. Now lets see if I can produced stuff this good (not likely :) ) I replaced the current one wi…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-21:6293855:Comment:52772010-10-21T14:27:08.000ZRoy Hirshkowitzhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/RoyHirshkowitz
I replaced the current one with the 2007 version. Someone should test this for me. Make sure your browser actually downloads the new one instead of using a cached version.
I replaced the current one with the 2007 version. Someone should test this for me. Make sure your browser actually downloads the new one instead of using a cached version. dunno... we did borrow 2xquad…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-21:6293855:Comment:52622010-10-21T13:22:56.000ZRos. Rihahttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/RosRiha
dunno... we did borrow 2xquad for testing and... yes, it IS faster, but not THAT faster... we decided we either stay on what we got (1xquad maximum) or we buy something even faster... scenario 1 means use of Farm, scenario 2 means we would not need it...
dunno... we did borrow 2xquad for testing and... yes, it IS faster, but not THAT faster... we decided we either stay on what we got (1xquad maximum) or we buy something even faster... scenario 1 means use of Farm, scenario 2 means we would not need it... One quad more and 4Gb RAM and…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-21:6293855:Comment:52592010-10-21T13:09:23.000ZMarc Chaumierhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/MarcChaumier
One quad more and 4Gb RAM and I 'll make good job ... ;o)
One quad more and 4Gb RAM and I 'll make good job ... ;o) I have 2 quad cores running a…tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-21:6293855:Comment:52552010-10-21T11:39:04.000ZPeter Milnerhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/PeterMilner
I have 2 quad cores running at 2.66GHz, Windows Vista Ultimate and 12Gb RAM.<br />
<br />
Peter
I have 2 quad cores running at 2.66GHz, Windows Vista Ultimate and 12Gb RAM.<br />
<br />
Peter On which hardware?tag:accurender.ning.com,2010-10-21:6293855:Comment:52522010-10-21T11:10:43.000ZMarc Chaumierhttp://accurender.ning.com/profile/MarcChaumier
On which hardware?
On which hardware?