AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Coming soon-- path tracer only.  Architectural applications are probably limited-- but it's interesting new territory anyway.

 

Views: 257

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Here's a blend of SSS and procedural marble:

 

Will do well in certain ceramic tiles

 

There is very well function of nxt, thank you! :-)

Here's a different use of a similar technology:

Is that fog I see?
In this case, confined to a box 1 meter high.  Uses subsurface scattering techniques...
What's the point of this technology?
I'm not sure I understand the question.  Do you mean "what are the applications?"
I just want to know what exactly your message means - Subsurface scattering - is it some new funcionality in nXt? What's so special on these pictures? What gives this technology?

There's an ok summary of subsurface scattering on Wikipedia.  It's an industry standard term so there's quite a bit about it out there.  Here's another decent article.

 

Generally speaking, the lighting in nXt and all previous versions of AR occurs at the surface only.  Subsurface scattering is essentially a volumetric technique, where interactions also occur within the medium.  It's required to accurately model materials which we think of as "translucent".  It's also helpful with materials where the light penetrates the surface a little bit-- such as the marble dragons-- and then scatters on its way out.  The feel of the images above would be very difficult to achieve without this technology.

 

A similar technique can also be used to model other participating media, such as the ground fog above.  This has a very different feel than previous fog implementations.  The technique can be extended to model non-homogenous participating media-- things like smoke or non-uniform fog (clouds?) etc..

 

Downside is that it can take a long time to resolve these materials-- accurate simulations almost require a path tracer approach.

Thanks a lot for this explanation. Looks promissing.

BTW. I found the Path Tracer the most interesting and valuable feature of nXt. It gives realy soft light (for the first time in whole AR history). But it's not perfect - it's slow - sometimes even hours and houndreds passes don't fix the noisy areas. I'd like to ask you - are you planning to develope this engine? I think it realy worth it.

It is being developed-- subsurface scattering is an example of this.  I'm working on a stand-alone version of the engine as well.

If you mean-- will the performance improve substantially?-- I don't think so.  I don't have any magic wands to wave at the moment.  One of the things I'm going for with this engine is simplicity.  None of the really technical items matter to the path tracer-- for example: Glossy switches, daylight portals, ambient lighting settings, etc.. have no effect.  The combination of this simplicity and the calculation of more light paths slow the thing down-- quite substantially in the case of interior daylighting.  The above mentioned stand-alone has almost nothing to set.

I'm also investigating another engine that has the potential for even more accurate simulations-- probably a little slower, though.

On the bright side-- computers continue to get faster.

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Rav replied to Rav's discussion Quick question
"this is my result :)"
4 hours ago
mike makki replied to mike makki's discussion villa animation
"there are lots of settings"
23 hours ago
Rich Hart posted a discussion

New version 0348 - NK21 posted

This versions fixes:A problem caused by glowing objects, such as light sources, which may not render properly when they are behind transparent surfaces. This only occurs when using the Hybrid engine.This new version can be downloaded here:nXtRender for AutoCAD - 32 bit - Version: 0346-NK04:http://www.renderplus.com/downloads/nXtRender/arnxt_0348-NK21.exe…See More
yesterday
Rich Rosemann replied to mike makki's discussion villa animation
"New version 5, Mike?  Swimmers, who'd of thought. The shadows in your animations seem to have dark (darker) shadows. Is this a result of the software or your choice higher contrast? "
yesterday
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion More Renderfarm glitches
"Yes-- 318 does not handle transparent or reflective decals correctly.  Remember, a problem was discovered in the writing of the farm data from the main product to the farm.  Later builds (345?) corrected this problem."
yesterday
Peter Milner replied to Peter Milner's discussion More Renderfarm glitches
"The renderfarm is going to be busy all weekend now. I'll do a re-test on this one once it is free. Does it make a difference that I'm using build 318 on my local machine and 347 on the Renderfarm? Maybe something is getting lost in…"
yesterday
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion More Renderfarm glitches
"Appears to work well in the hybrid engine as well-- although that will require 348 due to the bug we discovered yesterday."
yesterday
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion More Renderfarm glitches
"This is what I'm getting-- path tracer on the farm: Values are consistent with the interactive version on my main box.  If you're getting something different let me know-- we may need to make sure all of your software is up to date.…"
yesterday

© 2014   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service