AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

conjunto4

Views: 224

Comment

You need to be a member of AccuRender nXt to add comments!

Join AccuRender nXt

Comment by J Enrique Fernandez on May 1, 2012 at 2:02pm

Always you need a nice render to star with it, if not photoshop is useless.

Comment by Sampdoria on May 1, 2012 at 1:53pm

We photoshop a lot in Nxt or Max all the time, its the only way!

Comment by mike makki on May 1, 2012 at 3:53am

yeah right

Comment by George Ioannidis on May 1, 2012 at 3:40am

That's right :D

Comment by mike makki on May 1, 2012 at 3:28am

thats your opinion george

Comment by George Ioannidis on May 1, 2012 at 3:21am

Does that really matter? If we want to sell the picture it really doesn't, does it, Mike? Who cares then how we reach the desired result? Especially if someone can do something like that quickly, even in photomall... :D

Comment by mike makki on May 1, 2012 at 3:09am

this is a photoshop more than nxt

Comment by Sampdoria on December 19, 2011 at 1:07pm

Excellent render - I really love the roofs!

Comment by J Enrique Fernandez on September 26, 2011 at 1:20pm

Hola

Gracias por los comentarios,

los techos son texturas mapeadas, pero al final se editaron con photoshop  las aristas y un poco la parte final,  la arena es tambien una textura con bump y normals, el agua se agrego con photoshop, use un hdri de dosch extreme hires, con la tonalidad del agua similar para los reflejos y el ambiente.

 

Thanks for your comments

the roofs are meshes with map bitmaps and mask, also at the end use a litle photoshop editing to fix the edges and the low  end.

 

the light use a HDRI form dosch hires , with similar water color to the one in the image, add to the water in photoshop

 

enrique

Comment by Jorge Javier Lara Domínguez on September 26, 2011 at 6:36am
Muy buena imagen. Podrias compartir com hiciste la paja? la arena?

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Roy Hirshkowitz replied to J. Brown's discussion materials list by layer
"I don't think so-- but you can ask the guys at Render Plus for this feature.  It isn't hard to implement."
13 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion Large render
"Found and fixed (I think).  Render plus should be able to get a build out ASAP.  It will be 349. There are still a few pixels messed up in the smaller of the two files-- don't know why but it's an unrelated problem and should be…"
13 hours ago
J. Brown posted a discussion

materials list by layer

In the old Accurender there was a choice to only show unfrozen layers. Right now i get an entire list of all my layers and i have a bunch once i get some pieces of furniture in there... I just want to simplify it by only showing unfrozen layers. Can we still do that?See More
15 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion Large render
"Thanks-- I'll take a look this morning."
23 hours ago
Peter Milner replied to Peter Milner's discussion Large render
"I've got a smaller file which exhibits the same problem. I'll send it over via Wetransfer."
yesterday
Albert D Hart replied to Barry Hayden's discussion Visible Light Paths?
"Oops - Sorry - I didn't ready your original post properly. That beam wizard only works with SketchUp. But the rendering properties will work in AutoCAD. You have to create your own geometry and material settings. We are creating cones with a…"
yesterday
Barry Hayden replied to Barry Hayden's discussion Visible Light Paths?
"I am using Accurender NXT for Autocad version:1.0.329 Where is the "Lighting Wizard" tab?"
yesterday
Albert D Hart replied to Barry Hayden's discussion Visible Light Paths?
"You use the Beam tab on the Lighting Wizard. Take a look at: www.renderplus.com/wp2/wk/Visible_Light_Paths.htm We suggest you play around in with this in a simple model to see what works better for you. "
yesterday

© 2015   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service