AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

conjunto4

Views: 223

Comment

You need to be a member of AccuRender nXt to add comments!

Join AccuRender nXt

Comment by J Enrique Fernandez on May 1, 2012 at 2:02pm

Always you need a nice render to star with it, if not photoshop is useless.

Comment by Sampdoria on May 1, 2012 at 1:53pm

We photoshop a lot in Nxt or Max all the time, its the only way!

Comment by mike makki on May 1, 2012 at 3:53am

yeah right

Comment by George Ioannidis on May 1, 2012 at 3:40am

That's right :D

Comment by mike makki on May 1, 2012 at 3:28am

thats your opinion george

Comment by George Ioannidis on May 1, 2012 at 3:21am

Does that really matter? If we want to sell the picture it really doesn't, does it, Mike? Who cares then how we reach the desired result? Especially if someone can do something like that quickly, even in photomall... :D

Comment by mike makki on May 1, 2012 at 3:09am

this is a photoshop more than nxt

Comment by Sampdoria on December 19, 2011 at 1:07pm

Excellent render - I really love the roofs!

Comment by J Enrique Fernandez on September 26, 2011 at 1:20pm

Hola

Gracias por los comentarios,

los techos son texturas mapeadas, pero al final se editaron con photoshop  las aristas y un poco la parte final,  la arena es tambien una textura con bump y normals, el agua se agrego con photoshop, use un hdri de dosch extreme hires, con la tonalidad del agua similar para los reflejos y el ambiente.

 

Thanks for your comments

the roofs are meshes with map bitmaps and mask, also at the end use a litle photoshop editing to fix the edges and the low  end.

 

the light use a HDRI form dosch hires , with similar water color to the one in the image, add to the water in photoshop

 

enrique

Comment by Jorge Javier Lara Domínguez on September 26, 2011 at 6:36am
Muy buena imagen. Podrias compartir com hiciste la paja? la arena?

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

akinlolu olugboji commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

view 002 mx2

"Good catch."
8 minutes ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Albert D Hart's discussion Fractal Trees vs Images for trees
"nXt doesn't really work like that-- all of the objects need to be taken.  An object which is hidden from view may show up in a reflection, a shadow, refracted through glass, contribute to diffuse reflection of light in the scene, etc..…"
1 hour ago
George Ioannidis commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

view 002 mx2

"One oddity: nice green leaves of summer together with some melting snow islands on the grass and elsewhere. Except the tree is some kind of evergreen which I can't recognize. ;)"
10 hours ago
Steve Wojtynek replied to Albert D Hart's discussion Fractal Trees vs Images for trees
"Sounds like good method... something I need to look into as I've never used tree images. Assuming I want to continue working the old way using only fractal trees... Does AutoCAD and AccuRender take time to calculate trees hidden by buildings…"
21 hours ago
kingjin commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

view 002 mx2

"Maciej, hello, very good results, and ask how to get the car? THX."
yesterday
Albert D Hart posted a discussion

Fractal Trees vs Images for trees

"I'm usually rendering fairly detailed AutoCAD architectural models on 3Dmodeled sites with lots of AccuRender trees and shrubs.  I was wonderingwhat AccuRender 4 (using Acad2004) and AccuRender nXt (using Acad2011)actually "sees" when you select a view to render.  Do they "see" and have to"consider" the 50 trees behind the building (adding a lot of calculatingtime to a rendering), or do these programs "hide" and never consider thestuff that's hidden in a view by other entities?"Everything in th…See More
yesterday
Maciej posted photos
Saturday
J. Raul Cardenas replied to J. Raul Cardenas's discussion Render Settings
"8.6 MPixels is a lot indeed, specially in rendering time. Thanks a lot for the explanation, makes sense now."
May 19

© 2015   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service