AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Metal-in-glass chess set on granite chess board.

Metal-in-glass chess set on granite chess board.

NXT 308 engine 1 560 passes 6:30 rendering time at 1024X768 resolution. No light source except sky light.

Views: 517

Comment

You need to be a member of AccuRender nXt to add comments!

Join AccuRender nXt

Comment by George Ioannidis on August 20, 2012 at 6:38am

Well, of course yes Marc. Actually the prototype has been manufactured, but instead of glass, perspex was used. The temperature of melted glass was too high to leave untouched the enclosed metal figures. As a result, there were optically almost the same figures, but extremely lighter than the one from metal and glass. The final "feel" when you hold them is somehow "cheap" or "fake" now :(

Comment by Marc Chaumier on August 20, 2012 at 6:03am

Wonderful George! Do you keep a little space between glass and metal in a piece?

Comment by George Ioannidis on May 1, 2012 at 2:40am

Comment by George Ioannidis on May 1, 2012 at 1:35am

I realised it after posting the reply :D

G8-F6.

Comment by George Ioannidis on April 30, 2012 at 10:03am

All model parts are solids. Metal figures are solids in solid glass box (it is proposal for real chess of our design, which would be made not from real glass but from clear plastic - probably melted perspex). Solids are not touching each other, they are floating 2mm above the chess board as well. I don't know how NXT handles internally the solid-in-solid situation, but I can see some nice refractions expected and seemed in real life. My (and not only my for sure) only objection is the rendering time. I tried the same model in different renderer acquiring equal or even better result in fraction of time (in 1/6 to be exact). I think nXt needs to be speeded up somehow, speed of rendering in certain conditions and using particular combination of lights and materials is now really the only drawback it has.

Mario, what do you mean by D2 and D4?

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion Sun settings
"In this case, yes, it's subtle.  It's only readily apparent in the reflection of the window in the upper right quadrant of the sphere (as expected) where a small, bright, reflection of the solar disk can be seen.  I'm…"
Wednesday
Peter Milner replied to Peter Milner's discussion Sun settings
"Here is the same test with a glossy object. There is a very subtle difference in the reflection and the lighting. "
Wednesday
Rich Rosemann replied to Peter Milner's discussion Sun settings
"I'm very good at optical mis-conclusions. "
Tuesday
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion Sun settings
"Looks like there's some code to handle this in both the path tracer and hybrid engines.  A little unclear in the packet tracer."
Tuesday
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion Sun settings
"I'll have to look to see which engines respect that switch, I can't remember off-hand.  It controls whether glossy reflections get a contribution from the direct sun component.  The easiest way to see it would be to create a…"
Tuesday
Peter Milner replied to Peter Milner's discussion Sun settings
"If you flick between the two images full screen, there is actually no difference at all. Seeing one above the other makes them look slightly different, but it's just an optical illusion."
Tuesday
Rich Rosemann replied to Peter Milner's discussion Sun settings
"One image does seem to be a bit brighter.  Maybe it opens up the shadows a bit.  Or raises the ambient light. .....or something."
Tuesday
Peter Milner posted a discussion

Sun settings

Under the Sun settings, what does Sun Highlight do?I've tried it set to 0 and 1, but there doesn't seem to be any difference.See More
Tuesday

© 2016   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service