AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Metal-in-glass chess set on granite chess board.

NXT 308 engine 1 560 passes 6:30 rendering time at 1024X768 resolution. No light source except sky light.

Views: 517

Comment

You need to be a member of AccuRender nXt to add comments!

Join AccuRender nXt

Comment by Maciej on November 24, 2018 at 2:37am

I like it...   :)

Comment by George Ioannidis on August 20, 2012 at 6:38am

Well, of course yes Marc. Actually the prototype has been manufactured, but instead of glass, perspex was used. The temperature of melted glass was too high to leave untouched the enclosed metal figures. As a result, there were optically almost the same figures, but extremely lighter than the one from metal and glass. The final "feel" when you hold them is somehow "cheap" or "fake" now :(

Comment by Marc Chaumier on August 20, 2012 at 6:03am

Wonderful George! Do you keep a little space between glass and metal in a piece?

Comment by George Ioannidis on May 1, 2012 at 2:40am

Comment by George Ioannidis on May 1, 2012 at 1:35am

I realised it after posting the reply :D

G8-F6.

Comment by George Ioannidis on April 30, 2012 at 10:03am

All model parts are solids. Metal figures are solids in solid glass box (it is proposal for real chess of our design, which would be made not from real glass but from clear plastic - probably melted perspex). Solids are not touching each other, they are floating 2mm above the chess board as well. I don't know how NXT handles internally the solid-in-solid situation, but I can see some nice refractions expected and seemed in real life. My (and not only my for sure) only objection is the rendering time. I tried the same model in different renderer acquiring equal or even better result in fraction of time (in 1/6 to be exact). I think nXt needs to be speeded up somehow, speed of rendering in certain conditions and using particular combination of lights and materials is now really the only drawback it has.

Mario, what do you mean by D2 and D4?

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

mike makki replied to mike makki's discussion inspirational images by mike makki
Friday
mike makki replied to mike makki's discussion inspirational images by mike makki
Friday
mike makki replied to mike makki's discussion inspirational images by mike makki
"yes.. the new 9pro.. i also understand lumion has a plugin for Rhino i did this in 9 with timelaps"
Friday
S. Jaisimha replied to S. Jaisimha's discussion Material with stretch map (not tile)
"Hmm, I guess we'll have to use decals. Just that the decal needs to be applied to each object, instead of selecting them all and applying as a material, which will be much much faster when I have more than 30-40 objects to which the material…"
Dec 4
Thorsten Hedrich posted a photo
Dec 2
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to S. Jaisimha's discussion Material with stretch map (not tile)
"I don't believe we have anything that automatically scales to object size.  Decals might not be as horrible a workaround as you think-- they need to be scaled per object anyway.  There is an import option for textured meshes-- these…"
Nov 30
mike makki commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

view 002 small

"there goes the porsche again.... surely ... not the same one ..:D:D:D:D..."
Nov 29
S. Jaisimha posted a discussion

Material with stretch map (not tile)

Is there any way to create a material where the image map stretches across the object, instead of tiling?For example, the attached image "Jaali.jpg" is the material map I want to stretch across any object I apply it to. But it always seems to tile it across the object, as shown in the "Sample output.jpg".I can't use the object decal option, since the object that the material is applied to is not always the same (i.e., it can be applied to multiple objects and the size of these objects are not…See More
Nov 28

© 2018   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service