Odd Resolution Issue - AccuRender nXt2024-03-29T15:58:13Zhttps://accurender.ning.com/forum/topics/odd-resolution-issue?commentId=6293855%3AComment%3A118589&feed=yes&xn_auth=noGlad to hear it-- the 6 milli…tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-12-10:6293855:Comment:1187802015-12-10T18:30:28.557ZRoy Hirshkowitzhttps://accurender.ning.com/profile/RoyHirshkowitz
<p>Glad to hear it-- the 6 million pixels or so which this gave you should work-- provided people aren't too close to the sign.</p>
<p>Glad to hear it-- the 6 million pixels or so which this gave you should work-- provided people aren't too close to the sign.</p> Thanks Roy...Guess we just ne…tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-12-10:6293855:Comment:1187792015-12-10T18:07:29.975ZJohn Ferrishttps://accurender.ning.com/profile/JohnFerris
<p>Thanks Roy...Guess we just need to let them run as long as time allows.</p>
<p>The high resolution one came about for a job sign and groundbreaking presentation boards need. We ended up just using 150 dpi at around 40 passes - worked out well. Mounted boards were 120"x40".</p>
<p>Thanks again,</p>
<p>John</p>
<p></p>
<p>Thanks Roy...Guess we just need to let them run as long as time allows.</p>
<p>The high resolution one came about for a job sign and groundbreaking presentation boards need. We ended up just using 150 dpi at around 40 passes - worked out well. Mounted boards were 120"x40".</p>
<p>Thanks again,</p>
<p>John</p>
<p></p> The tone operator will be ver…tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-12-10:6293855:Comment:1188782015-12-10T17:06:32.487ZRoy Hirshkowitzhttps://accurender.ning.com/profile/RoyHirshkowitz
<p>The tone operator will be very fidgety at a low number of passes-- it normally takes a hundred or so for things to settle down. Obviously something went very wrong at 600 DPI-- a whopping resolution of 5400 x 18000-- or more than 97 million pixels.</p>
<p>The tone operator will be very fidgety at a low number of passes-- it normally takes a hundred or so for things to settle down. Obviously something went very wrong at 600 DPI-- a whopping resolution of 5400 x 18000-- or more than 97 million pixels.</p> Last file attached...had to r…tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-12-10:6293855:Comment:1188762015-12-10T15:05:17.491ZJohn Ferrishttps://accurender.ning.com/profile/JohnFerris
<p>Last file attached...had to reduce size.</p>
<p>Last file attached...had to reduce size.</p> A few observations/questions:…tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-12-10:6293855:Comment:1185892015-12-10T15:00:48.018ZJohn Ferrishttps://accurender.ning.com/profile/JohnFerris
<p>A few observations/questions:</p>
<p>See attached images/image names for comparison.</p>
<p>All settings remained the same except for the "Density" (DPI).</p>
<p>"X" was set to 30 and "Y" was set to 9; Lighting didn't change; Number of passes didn't change (except for one that went to 11).</p>
<p>Render Setting Image Outcome</p>
<p>9”X30”-10 PASSES-75 DPI 18.75”X5.63”-120 DPI</p>
<p>9”X30”-10 PASSES-150 DPI 37.5”X11.125”-120…</p>
<p>A few observations/questions:</p>
<p>See attached images/image names for comparison.</p>
<p>All settings remained the same except for the "Density" (DPI).</p>
<p>"X" was set to 30 and "Y" was set to 9; Lighting didn't change; Number of passes didn't change (except for one that went to 11).</p>
<p>Render Setting Image Outcome</p>
<p>9”X30”-10 PASSES-75 DPI 18.75”X5.63”-120 DPI</p>
<p>9”X30”-10 PASSES-150 DPI 37.5”X11.125”-120 DPI</p>
<p>9”X30”-11 PASSES-300 DPI 75”X22.5”-120 DPI</p>
<p>9”X30”-11 PASSES-600 DPI 150”X45”-120 DPI</p>
<p></p>
<p>Resized the attached images to the original intended outcome.</p>
<p>What's going on with the colors and brightness...and image size outcome?</p>
<p>Thanks for your thoughts...</p>
<p>John</p>
<p></p> 10-4...Thanks again Roy...and…tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-10-27:6293855:Comment:1186242015-10-27T16:10:47.708ZJohn Ferrishttps://accurender.ning.com/profile/JohnFerris
<p>10-4...Thanks again Roy...and Peter.</p>
<p>I'll give an update later after I try my options.</p>
<p>John</p>
<p>10-4...Thanks again Roy...and Peter.</p>
<p>I'll give an update later after I try my options.</p>
<p>John</p> I'll look, but my recollectio…tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-10-27:6293855:Comment:1186222015-10-27T16:07:10.901ZRoy Hirshkowitzhttps://accurender.ning.com/profile/RoyHirshkowitz
<p>I'll look, but my recollection was that your issue was image editor related. These are being saved directly to jpg. This may be a different problem so an update is unlikely to help.</p>
<p>I'll look, but my recollection was that your issue was image editor related. These are being saved directly to jpg. This may be a different problem so an update is unlikely to help.</p> Then maybe I need an update!…tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-10-27:6293855:Comment:1185272015-10-27T15:42:55.919ZJohn Ferrishttps://accurender.ning.com/profile/JohnFerris
<p>Then maybe I need an update! Need to take a look...</p>
<p>Thanks Peter...</p>
<p>John</p>
<p>Then maybe I need an update! Need to take a look...</p>
<p>Thanks Peter...</p>
<p>John</p> I had a similar problem a few…tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-10-27:6293855:Comment:1188172015-10-27T15:30:26.667ZPeter Milnerhttps://accurender.ning.com/profile/PeterMilner
<p>I had a similar problem a few months ago using the render farm software. The images came out almost black.</p>
<p>Roy found the problem and fixed it in an update.</p>
<p>I was only rendering a measly 58.5 million pixels.</p>
<p>I had a similar problem a few months ago using the render farm software. The images came out almost black.</p>
<p>Roy found the problem and fixed it in an update.</p>
<p>I was only rendering a measly 58.5 million pixels.</p> Thanks for the prompt reply R…tag:accurender.ning.com,2015-10-27:6293855:Comment:1185232015-10-27T15:00:33.573ZJohn Ferrishttps://accurender.ning.com/profile/JohnFerris
<p>Thanks for the prompt reply Roy....Always appreciate coming here for help.</p>
<p>I had considered the ortho to be the issue - I'll either set up a similar view with a distant camera or will just go with the lower res and upsize post render...and save some sanity.</p>
<p>Thanks Roy...</p>
<p>John</p>
<p>Thanks for the prompt reply Roy....Always appreciate coming here for help.</p>
<p>I had considered the ortho to be the issue - I'll either set up a similar view with a distant camera or will just go with the lower res and upsize post render...and save some sanity.</p>
<p>Thanks Roy...</p>
<p>John</p>