AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

One more thread, Roy, to talk about a strange behavior in e4, with the joint bump in the settings of the procedural tile material. Here is the illustration and the dwg

Views: 841

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Marc, what exactly is the problem here? E4 solution looks better than E1 I think.

Hi George, look at that. Don't you see that something looks inverted in the bump of the E4? Or do I have to stop my little beer of the evening? Or rush to the medecin... ;))

I posted this same observation in the Build 315 thread. The bump mapping is opposite for the Hybrid (E4) engine.

Oops:D Never stop any beer you have started to drink Marc and of course do not visit the oculist, you do not need it :D

I should better put on my glasses next time :D

But I think there is a problem with the E1 result. The third joint width looks twice as wide than the others. But it can be cause of bitmap you've used. So maybe it has nothing to do with the bumping issue you and Garret mentioned.

It's true that with the E1, the third joint is exactly the same as the others. They are procedural joint of the nXt Tile Material Editor. So it's strange... I give the dwg with materials, above, so you can examin it.

And with the E4, its seems that the joint appear in + or in - depending on the angle of vision. On the left they are good, but on the right, at the point where you don't have to see anymore the shadow in the joint, nXt produce a shadow... And so the joint looks as if it was inverted.

With an higher resolution, we can see strange crossing of the lines. Perhaps my bump is too strong...

I think the joints look funny because of the extremely wide camera lense angle. The joints that appear darker are normal to the lense while the others quickly reach a sharp angle to the lense.

The image here is using 35mm lense while Mark's original is using a 12.8mm lense.

Garret, would you pull out your car of my pool, plz!!! ;o)))

The crossing lines look strange, I have to try some experimentation but no time today...

I wouldn't waste too much time on this Marc-- the bump mapping on procedural materials is not very robust-- no more than adequate.  Use a bitmap if you want something better.

I understand, Roy.

It was practical to match the bump with the joint in the tile material. And so, to obtain no repetitive tile material, without enormous tile bitmaps. Perhaps, I have to find the way to match a bump bitmap with a procedural material (???) or accept this little problem... Or use tile material without bump... It's true that the problem appear only when your point of view is very close.

You can easily create a tile bumpmap in Photoshop or eq.  You only need a single tile.  I would work in gray scale, starting with black for the joint and white for the tile.  Careful blurring of the joint should do it.

If you're not very close to the tile, the procedural system you're using will work just fine.  Lower values for the bump will also help.

Thanks Roy. But I can't obtain that the joint of my bump map is synchronous, with the joint of the procedural material. And same problem for the width of these joints... And do I put the bump map to the "tile" settings (I use 2 procedurals in the fractal option) ? Or use it in the "joint"settings. I find it too difficult...

So forget it.

I have to accept never put my camera too close to the tiles... With procedural tiles

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

James Bloomer posted photos
May 1
Roy Hirshkowitz commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

c3

"No license yet. Send some results when you can-- might be easier as a forum post instead of this comment section."
Apr 7
Roy Hirshkowitz commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

c3

"The drawings are likely scaling correctly-- don't scale the geometry please. These are only display units for the arstudio interface."
Apr 7
Maciej commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

c3

"You were right, Roy. It was about the file name - ash on my head. ARStudio seems to be very ok for my humble interiors' purposes. One minor point (see attached) - meters or millimeters only, what about centimeters? I need to scale all my…"
Apr 7
George Ioannidis commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

g2

"Yeah, I know, usual situation. :)"
Apr 7
Roy Hirshkowitz commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

c3

"Looks like there's no file name.  Try saving the drawing to a file first, then run ArStudio.  This is a bug, obviously.  Thanks."
Apr 7
Maciej commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

c3

"I followed all the instructions and that is what I see now...Life is a struggle... Is there something I did wrong? AutoCAD 2013, nXt 0358-SG17, Windows 7"
Apr 7
Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion was featured

AccuRender Studio

Here's the latest version of the new stuff.  If you're interested, try it at your leisure and let me know what you find.  It's a work in progress, so please be kind.  We'll likely have some bugs and certainly have some missing features.******Some highlights:Standalone renderer which accepts input from Rhino, Sketchup, Obj and FBX.Plugins for AutoCAD and other CAD applications.Online material and plant…See More
Apr 7

© 2020   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service