AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

hola necesitaria trabajar mas rapido , tengo una maquina

amd x6  2.8 con 4 gb , mi pregunta es:

1: como tendria que hacer para poner 2 o 3 maquinas trabajando en red

2 : cual es es costo

3 : si en todas las maquinas tienen que estar instaladas las bliblotecas de texturas o solo en la principal,

4 : cual es  la mejor recomendacion de equipo y que  cantidad de memoria para la o las maquinas

5 : si la velocidad se directamente proporcional a la cantidad de equipos ...osea 2 equipos = mitad de tiempo

6 : si es como pienso ya que la traduccion no es del todo fiel , que una misma imagen la procesan varios equipos a la vez

7 : si es asi que pasa si algunas de las maquina se cuelga, si las otras siguen prosesando normalmente esa misma imagen

pd espero poder entendernos

Views: 61

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

There isn't a definitive answer to most of these-- you'll need to experiment.  You get a two-node farm for free, so you can try with that.  For more, you'll need to purchase a render farm license (I don't remember how much it is-- but not very much.)  In general, if you mix fast and slow machines on the network you won't get very good results.  The rule of thumb for performance (# of cores X clock speed) still holds-- but the farm does depend (also) on the speed of your network and how much data you're sending around.  You shouldn't need to have materials or other libraries installed on the nodes-- the package it sends around for rendering should be completely self-contained.  

 

************

 

The render farm generally works pretty well-- although I might suggest waiting for my next update (this weekend?) since I haven't updated the farm in a while.  The results should be consistent.  The farm should be pretty robust if machines are crashing, although that shouldn't be happening anyway.

 

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

akinlolu olugboji replied to Rav's discussion Quick question
"Attempt to download your model spits out the following error. "
2 hours ago
Rav replied to Rav's discussion Quick question
yesterday
Rav replied to Rav's discussion Quick question
"Thank you very much, you are very helpful. I've changed wood texture, looks way better. Here is my model.Thank you once again, I appreciate it."
yesterday
Chris Fox replied to Rav's discussion Quick question
"Sometimes with lighting you have to play with the settings.. what might work in one case will not work as well in another... depends on the geometry of the Architecture, the glossiness, reflectivity and transparency of the materials"
yesterday
Chris Fox replied to Rav's discussion Quick question
"You need to also raise the cloudiness to .5 and raise the ambient to high... if you could send me the model I can manually set the sun the settings. I also have a few good wood plans.... see attached..."
yesterday
Jan Verzelen replied to Rav's discussion Quick question
"did yo search here, or here ? " Seamless wood planks" in Google can do miracles also."
yesterday
Rav replied to Rav's discussion Quick question
"Thank you for respondingI've tried it and the result was just like on this first photo i uploaded :/ Despite sun 2.0 walls in shadow were dark."
yesterday
Jan Verzelen replied to Rav's discussion Quick question
"search for a better wood texture. The repeating pattern is kiiling this rendering in my humble opinion. "
yesterday

© 2014   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service