AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

hola necesitaria trabajar mas rapido , tengo una maquina

amd x6  2.8 con 4 gb , mi pregunta es:

1: como tendria que hacer para poner 2 o 3 maquinas trabajando en red

2 : cual es es costo

3 : si en todas las maquinas tienen que estar instaladas las bliblotecas de texturas o solo en la principal,

4 : cual es  la mejor recomendacion de equipo y que  cantidad de memoria para la o las maquinas

5 : si la velocidad se directamente proporcional a la cantidad de equipos ...osea 2 equipos = mitad de tiempo

6 : si es como pienso ya que la traduccion no es del todo fiel , que una misma imagen la procesan varios equipos a la vez

7 : si es asi que pasa si algunas de las maquina se cuelga, si las otras siguen prosesando normalmente esa misma imagen

pd espero poder entendernos

Views: 70

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

There isn't a definitive answer to most of these-- you'll need to experiment.  You get a two-node farm for free, so you can try with that.  For more, you'll need to purchase a render farm license (I don't remember how much it is-- but not very much.)  In general, if you mix fast and slow machines on the network you won't get very good results.  The rule of thumb for performance (# of cores X clock speed) still holds-- but the farm does depend (also) on the speed of your network and how much data you're sending around.  You shouldn't need to have materials or other libraries installed on the nodes-- the package it sends around for rendering should be completely self-contained.  

 

************

 

The render farm generally works pretty well-- although I might suggest waiting for my next update (this weekend?) since I haven't updated the farm in a while.  The results should be consistent.  The farm should be pretty robust if machines are crashing, although that shouldn't be happening anyway.

 

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Joseph Chan posted photos
Monday
Daniel Hargreaves replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"coMotion Build 015 is posted and ready to download. I think I found why Previews were not exporting. If you check the box, setup the file permitters and then click play, it should export the individual…"
Jan 13
Daniel Hargreaves replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"I do all of my testing in 2014... same issue. Originally programmed for 2009 (I think)"
Jan 12
Kevin Lockwood replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"I was running Acad 2015"
Jan 12
Daniel Hargreaves replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"I did some digging this morning and if "Export Preview" is checked, it is suppose to write the image files. But even in my simple test it was not. Possibly something to do with the newer AutoCAD. I will continue to look into it have it…"
Jan 12
Kevin Lockwood replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"I see how to get it to "play" the animation, but don't have controls to record/save the animation."
Jan 11
Kevin Lockwood replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"I realized after writing this post, that something was running in the background. I had it set for pngs, but nothing was in the destination folder. Whatever it was, took a while to do nothing. :) Off to run a much smaller test..."
Jan 11
Daniel Hargreaves replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"I think I did add in a Preview... at least the controls. I'll look into the output if it is not functioning correctly."
Jan 11

© 2017   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service