AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Views: 107

Comment

You need to be a member of AccuRender nXt to add comments!

Join AccuRender nXt

Comment by Jelena on January 19, 2015 at 10:53pm

well done, nice! especially i like your details - the "dirt"

Comment by George Ioannidis on January 19, 2015 at 3:29pm

More or less you just described exactly the way of my workflow. Renderings I do are in most of cases just a bait for the customer - it works well almost every time ;) and of course an eye-candy for me the 3D visualization lover :D

Amen too, brother :)

Comment by Maciej on January 19, 2015 at 8:19am

George, all my efforts to be "more realistic than Reality" were predominately for "us" - architects and Visualisers, as you well pointed. I agree - 90% of my client are absolutely unconscious about the details like shadow, sun match, leaking walls, perspective match, depth of field, etc., etc.

The only thing (besides money, of course) they see is that everything seems to be as it is now. With possibly minimal efforts, of cours. Ratio "Efforts-Win" is still not very impressive - see Mikes' sophisticated details and struggle to get the client.

My "visualisations" is not the point of my work - the point is Building Regs phase drawing, and, desirably, supervision. And one of steps to achieve this aim is to produce realistic visualisation.

Amen.   :)

Uff, that was quiet a lot of philosophy of architect and practice owner in business..

Comment by George Ioannidis on January 19, 2015 at 4:36am

Impressive perspective match Maciej. If I were you I would try to "fake" some tree shadows on rendered building (I suppose it's the one with red windows casement) in GIMP, though it could not be exact result as if some invisible trees cast shadows on it during rendering.

I believe it is clearly your (and maybe ours, the architects and visualizers) effort to reach perfection and photo-realism and have some tree shadows there, but I am quite sure nearly none of my (or your) clients will ever notice this absence.

I can see some painted shadows as it continues from the existing building's wall to "new" wall and I would be quite happy with that :) It matches the current sun position of the real photo, so it's hardly distinguishable.

Comment by kingjin on January 18, 2015 at 7:04pm
The perfect combination of real and virtual, very good, I ask you that how to set up the white glass, thank you.
Comment by Maciej on January 18, 2015 at 12:19pm

Kevin - unfortunately, it didn't work, I am afraid...

Comment by Kevin Lockwood on January 18, 2015 at 11:35am

Very Nice Work!!

I see why you wanted the tree shadow now.

Comment by akinlolu olugboji on January 18, 2015 at 11:19am

The photoshoping is just awesome!

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

George Ioannidis commented on Peter Milner's photo
Thumbnail

screend brochure 2019 05

"Those are all exceptional work, Peter! Congratulations!On this one only: bricks look big to me, but maybe I am wrong. Also some areas in shadow look still a bit noisy."
Wednesday
Peter Milner posted photos
Tuesday
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio for AutoCAD
"1-  On the Rendering Tab there is a popdown called Destination.  The option is called something like "Local Out of Process".  2-  No, installation will require admin access."
Oct 5
Mark Brinkman replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio for AutoCAD
"I am an old Accurender user. I now need to try and re-create some old images from old models. (about 20 years old) I have now downloaded Accurender Studio, and now work with AutoCAD 2016 and 2017 I have 2 questions related to Accurender Studio: 1)…"
Oct 4
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion AR Studio ground plane
"Yep-- the groundplane in ArStudio should be turned on in that case-- but you will get a rectangle which may need to be sized.  If it's not turning on, that's probably a bug."
Sep 26
Peter Milner replied to Peter Milner's discussion AR Studio ground plane
"Not to worry. I've just seen that ArStudio has its own version of a ground plane. It just doesn't translate the old nXt one."
Sep 26
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion AR Studio ground plane
"Sorry-- just got back into town last night.  Infinite objects aren't supported in ArStudio-- so yes-- the ground plane has to be represented by a finite object, in this case a rectangle.  You don't have to use mine, you can use…"
Sep 25
mike makki commented on Tibor K. Karsai's photo
Thumbnail

WestlakeV - Copy

"good image and nice montage... the only thing is that the sky is too blue ... a light colour and would make it perfect"
Sep 21

© 2019   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service