AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Views: 107

Comment

You need to be a member of AccuRender nXt to add comments!

Join AccuRender nXt

Comment by Jelena on January 19, 2015 at 10:53pm

well done, nice! especially i like your details - the "dirt"

Comment by George Ioannidis on January 19, 2015 at 3:29pm

More or less you just described exactly the way of my workflow. Renderings I do are in most of cases just a bait for the customer - it works well almost every time ;) and of course an eye-candy for me the 3D visualization lover :D

Amen too, brother :)

Comment by Maciej on January 19, 2015 at 8:19am

George, all my efforts to be "more realistic than Reality" were predominately for "us" - architects and Visualisers, as you well pointed. I agree - 90% of my client are absolutely unconscious about the details like shadow, sun match, leaking walls, perspective match, depth of field, etc., etc.

The only thing (besides money, of course) they see is that everything seems to be as it is now. With possibly minimal efforts, of cours. Ratio "Efforts-Win" is still not very impressive - see Mikes' sophisticated details and struggle to get the client.

My "visualisations" is not the point of my work - the point is Building Regs phase drawing, and, desirably, supervision. And one of steps to achieve this aim is to produce realistic visualisation.

Amen.   :)

Uff, that was quiet a lot of philosophy of architect and practice owner in business..

Comment by George Ioannidis on January 19, 2015 at 4:36am

Impressive perspective match Maciej. If I were you I would try to "fake" some tree shadows on rendered building (I suppose it's the one with red windows casement) in GIMP, though it could not be exact result as if some invisible trees cast shadows on it during rendering.

I believe it is clearly your (and maybe ours, the architects and visualizers) effort to reach perfection and photo-realism and have some tree shadows there, but I am quite sure nearly none of my (or your) clients will ever notice this absence.

I can see some painted shadows as it continues from the existing building's wall to "new" wall and I would be quite happy with that :) It matches the current sun position of the real photo, so it's hardly distinguishable.

Comment by kingjin on January 18, 2015 at 7:04pm
The perfect combination of real and virtual, very good, I ask you that how to set up the white glass, thank you.
Comment by Maciej on January 18, 2015 at 12:19pm

Kevin - unfortunately, it didn't work, I am afraid...

Comment by Kevin Lockwood on January 18, 2015 at 11:35am

Very Nice Work!!

I see why you wanted the tree shadow now.

Comment by akinlolu olugboji on January 18, 2015 at 11:19am

The photoshoping is just awesome!

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Peter Milner replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio
"Yes, the glass material translated as Refractive automatically."
Dec 23, 2020
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio
"Yeah-- like I mentioned the caustics are accurate but could be annoying.  Things that might alter it include changing the sun angle so it's not striking the chair's metal surfaces so directly, changing the roughness of the chair…"
Dec 23, 2020
Peter Milner replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio
"Here's the latest render using metallic materials. The chrome now looks a lot better. I do feel though that the reflected light on the back wall is too bright."
Dec 23, 2020
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio
"Ah-- so that's a function of the material type.  The standard material won't give you a mirror anymore.  You need to change the material to metallic and you should get something more familiar.  Use the Type popdown on the…"
Dec 18, 2020
Peter Milner replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio
"Pacing a mirror on the back wall (reflections = 1.0, noise = 0.0), you can see the difference more clearly (top image is nXt)."
Dec 18, 2020
Peter Milner replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio
"You can see from these two images that there is definitely something wrong with reflective surfaces. It appears the light is being reflected, but not objects or textures. In the nXt version (top image), the carpet texture is being reflected in the…"
Dec 18, 2020
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio
"It's interesting-- overall the quality of this interior is very high for that short amount of processing, and may be acceptable for certain scenes.  In this one, however, there are some reflective caustics that are taking longer to…"
Dec 17, 2020
Peter Milner replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio
"ARDECAL now works. Here's the image after 10 minutes of rendering. I do have a slight concern that reflective surfaces seem rather dull. This is particularly evident on the end frame of the desk and the base of the chair."
Dec 17, 2020

© 2021   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service