AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

PAOLO CESARINI
  • Male
  • MAGIONE
  • Italy
Share on Facebook Share

PAOLO CESARINI's Friends

  • Roy Hirshkowitz

PAOLO CESARINI's Discussions

Error in Windows xp sp3 - Italy - Autocad 2007 full
1 Reply

In my computer I recently installed "AccuRender nXt ver.310 for 32-bit XP." When I put a plant or flower or open them "Nxt plant editor" gives me an error "Exception message c0000013 Parameters…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by Roy Hirshkowitz Sep 20, 2012.

 

PAOLO CESARINI's Page

Latest Activity

Roy Hirshkowitz replied to PAOLO CESARINI's discussion Error in Windows xp sp3 - Italy - Autocad 2007 full
"Can you attach an example of a plant that you can't open in the Plant Editor?  You may have to zip it first."
Sep 20, 2012
PAOLO CESARINI posted a discussion

Error in Windows xp sp3 - Italy - Autocad 2007 full

In my computer I recently installed "AccuRender nXt ver.310 for 32-bit XP." When I put a plant or flower or open them "Nxt plant editor" gives me an error "Exception message c0000013 Parameters Processsing 75b1bf7c4 4 75b1bf7c 75b1bf7c". Until now I have never had any problems. If I open the plants created by me with the "Plant Editor" everything works fine. Can you help me? Thank you.See More
Sep 20, 2012
Rey F. Rosario Berrios liked PAOLO CESARINI's photo
May 29, 2012
akinlolu olugboji liked PAOLO CESARINI's photo
May 29, 2012
PAOLO CESARINI posted a photo

DEFINITIVO ultimo

some lots with new houses ... in Umbria
May 29, 2012
PAOLO CESARINI replied to Paul Jackson's discussion Worth upgrading to NXT from AR4?
"...IL CLIENTE NON HA VOLUTO ! Grazie per i complimenti..."
Dec 16, 2011
PAOLO CESARINI replied to Paul Jackson's discussion Worth upgrading to NXT from AR4?
"My job finished... Good... rendering in 3h 48m Bye"
Dec 14, 2011
PAOLO CESARINI replied to Paul Jackson's discussion Worth upgrading to NXT from AR4?
"I have not yet found a solution for the plants ... I'm still 'working on a large file and not being able to save as jpg, I read on the forums that large…"
Dec 10, 2011
PAOLO CESARINI replied to Paul Jackson's discussion Worth upgrading to NXT from AR4?
"HELLO, I can not upload the plants good old "AccuRender 3" in the laptop where I have Autocad 2009 64 bits.Why? It seems that does not respect the scale, or…"
Dec 9, 2011
PAOLO CESARINI is now a member of AccuRender nXt
Dec 8, 2011

Profile Information

PAOLO CESARINI's Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

Comment Wall

You need to be a member of AccuRender nXt to add comments!

Join AccuRender nXt

  • No comments yet!
 
 
 

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

George Ioannidis commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

view 002 mx2

"One oddity: nice green leaves of summer together with some melting snow islands on the grass and elsewhere. Except the tree is some kind of evergreen which I can't recognize. ;)"
2 hours ago
Steve Wojtynek replied to Albert D Hart's discussion Fractal Trees vs Images for trees
"Sounds like good method... something I need to look into as I've never used tree images. Assuming I want to continue working the old way using only fractal trees... Does AutoCAD and AccuRender take time to calculate trees hidden by buildings…"
13 hours ago
kingjin commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

view 002 mx2

"Maciej, hello, very good results, and ask how to get the car? THX."
18 hours ago
Albert D Hart posted a discussion

Fractal Trees vs Images for trees

"I'm usually rendering fairly detailed AutoCAD architectural models on 3Dmodeled sites with lots of AccuRender trees and shrubs.  I was wonderingwhat AccuRender 4 (using Acad2004) and AccuRender nXt (using Acad2011)actually "sees" when you select a view to render.  Do they "see" and have to"consider" the 50 trees behind the building (adding a lot of calculatingtime to a rendering), or do these programs "hide" and never consider thestuff that's hidden in a view by other entities?"Everything in th…See More
yesterday
Maciej posted photos
Saturday
J. Raul Cardenas replied to J. Raul Cardenas's discussion Render Settings
"8.6 MPixels is a lot indeed, specially in rendering time. Thanks a lot for the explanation, makes sense now."
May 19
akinlolu olugboji replied to mike makki's discussion my entry animation for cg competition at www.cgarchitect.com
"Awesome work, just can't help wondering why so many sheep are let on their own without a Shepard, also on the Patio, with so much leave movement which I believe is due to wind, it is unaffected be the burning fire. "
May 19
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to J. Raul Cardenas's discussion Render Settings
"No-- nothing to do with darker or lighter.  It does define resolution by dots per unit-- for example 36" x 24" at 100 dpi will provide 3600 x 2400 rendered pixels (8.6 million).  It's exactly the same as specifying 3600 x…"
May 19

© 2015   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service