advanced rendering for AutoCAD
Suburbs luxury house
Finalized version, only few post process things done outside nXt.
Comment
-
Comment by Jorge Javier Lara Domínguez on February 11, 2013 at 8:07am
-
Bonita imagen!!! Excelente manejo de los materiales. Felicidades. Sin embargo, me hubiera gustados algunos causticos en la alberca. Saludos
-
Comment by Marc Chaumier on February 6, 2013 at 4:07am
-
The possibilty to use curved faces and several type of faces in the tree editor and in the groundcover tool, could help us to reach such a good result. I believe it's not a big modification, but so essential for the realism of our pictures!!!
Congratulation for your picture, George!
-
Comment by Roy Hirshkowitz on February 5, 2013 at 10:24am
-
In any case, one of the most complex models attempted to date. I imagine 10GB or more to hold the database.
-
Comment by George Ioannidis on February 5, 2013 at 8:51am
-
Yes, there was. Not in the grass model though, only in full render. It was maybe due to displacement. I am not sure though.
-
-
Was there a difference between virtual and actual faces? It still seems a little high to me-- only about 4 bytes / face in the obj.
-
-
Just grass counts 45264060 faces. The whole model is 57586458.
-
-
Yes, there are several stone surfaces with displacement, I forgot it. All the surface down to garage door is displaced as well as the pathway to house entrance as well as the sidewalk. I'll try to render just the grass file to see it's polygon count.
-
-
175 million bytes / 5.7 x 10^9 polygons yields only .03 bytes/polygon-- not really possible (there is no instancing in obj). Did you create a tile which you repeated in AutoCAD? If not the 5.7 x 10^9 figure may be caused by something else-- likely a displacement-- the stone texture? You could help me out when you get a chance by loading just the grass into a model, starting a render, and seeing how many faces are generated. Include both virtual and actual.
-
-
No Roy, polygons count was 5.700.000.000 (5.7X10^9). I don't know if it was instanced internally in OBJ file. Starting Blender file with particles converted to polygons was nearly 175MB large. Without converting it it was just about 25MB.
-
-
Milliard usually means one billion (1 x 10^9). Is that what you mean? or rather 1 million? If we're talking 5.7 x 10^9 I imagine that had to be instanced (?).
Search
Translate
Latest Activity
V1x copy
"The wooden texture of the TV-Console looks quite decent.
The Wallpaper on the left has an interesting structure, maybe it would look even better, if you make the texture seamless + applying a little bit of depth, e. g. with highpass - filter in PS?"
"Thank you for help on this topic!
Will test 'Automesher LT' (developed by Automapki), if I run into troubles again.
[Sometimes I was wondering about, if this forum is still alive... .]"
"Good day,
I searched the former forum posts and found another option to solve this problem which is another plugin to autocad-----AUTOMAPKI. You can give it a try."
Thallasso_Pre_Study_2_50mm
3ds +obj import works for older files-'xfrog-plants', for instance... .Comments + Critics appreciated!Hopefully accurender still survives!
"Found 'Textured Mesh Support' only works with obj and 3ds Files which do not contain PBR Maps.
To 'obj' converted newer 3ds do not render in nXt :-("
OBJ Plant Issue - Diffuse Maps
Hi to anyone;maybe a similar issue as Mr.Holz announced recently, (PBR Texture question):-added a obj. plant via 'Textured Mesh Objects' widget-reassigned maps (materials showed up, but with no maps attached, (although mtl. files are in the same folder as corresponding maps and obj files)-tried to render (see 'result')So my question is: Does anybody knew about how to handle Diffuse Maps in nXt, i suspect there is no interpretation of the UV-Coordinates?Any hints and help kindly appreciated!…See More
© 2026 Header image courtesy Peter Milner
Powered by
You need to be a member of AccuRender nXt to add comments!
Join AccuRender nXt