AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Hi, Roy, I need your advice about the settings of the translucent plastic or glass, to reproduce the "Barrissol effect".

On the pictures, I show you the faces only tagged as area lights, 10 or 20 cm behind the faces tagged as thin plastic or glass objects. The light is given by LEDs, but is not uniform.

Thanks.

Views: 955

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You'll need to try some things.  I would start by placing area lights behind the panels, and making the panels using glass with roughness.  This should work better than making the panels themselves the light sources-- this light would be uniform in this case.  Try to limit the number of light sources if possible (it may not be.)

Let me know what you get or if you want me to take a look at a model.

Thanks Roy, That's what I was trying, but I need to put some "glow" on the glass. I would like that the glass glowes, just with the area lights, but I am at the beginning of the experience. In case, I send you the dwg, if you have some time.

Attachments:

Thanks Mario, for your advices, I'll try all these way. I'll post the result.

Put 6 smaller light sources behind the screen.  Gave the screen some thickness for better refraction by copying and offseting the surface.  Changed the screen material a little-- IOR 1.6, Roughness 1.0, Transparency .85, -- no glow.  Until you're convinced that you can't adequately model this physically, avoid all tricks such as glow or those that Mario is suggesting.

e1, BTW.  This stuff isn't working well with e4-- I need to make some changes here.

roughness is set to maximum i see, is there a way to make the material more diffuse? Maybe changing the distance between light source and screen or is there no place left? Is there any change by tagging the lights as omnidirectional or diffuse?

Not really, no-- but you can change the shape and configuration of the light sources behind the screen.  I did these quickly for illustration only.  I also only let this run for a minute or so-- things should smooth out a bit after a while.

Thanks a lot Roy. When I offset the surface, is it to simulate a solid, so do I have to tag the both as "thin", or not? The effect that my customer is looking for, is the case of the bigs disks at the ceiling. Something like this picture, but with the better lighting effect that you obtain. 

No-- don't tag it as thin.  

I increased the distance between the sources and the screen for this one.  It also uses e4 plus a tiny bit of glow to simulate the sub-surface scattering of the material which we are not going to calculate (it would take forever).  You won't be able to use e4 for yours yet, I had to make some changes here since the glow isn't working.

Put the glow in a separate channel so you can easily adjust it.  Don't get carried away with it, it is "cheating".

Thanks Mario, the illumination looks very good. I'm going to take a look on your file. Thanks for the time you spend on it.

Thanks Mario. I see, with your help, that omni light are better for this case. And my question to Roy: Why? What is the difference in the functioning betwen area or diffuse, and omni? The "area" picture is not finalized, but its enough to see the difference...

The omni light distributes light equally in all directions.

The area light distributes light based on its direction vector (straight down by default-- but an editable setting).  The light is only distributed in one hemisphere and the intensity decreases at glancing angles using the cosine with respect to the direction vector.

Thanks a lot Roy. I understand, now, why the light is stronger in the space between two surfaces (close enough) tagged as omni, but not in the case of the area light.

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Decio Baptistucci posted a photo

TBR III 06032015 A

Residencia Tambore IIIEngine Hybrid.Passes 200Size 1800X1200Time 4:00 hours
1 hour ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to norton torres's discussion Accurender for Mac
"No time soon, no.  Mac will not give you more power, speed and resolution, BTW.  The computers that run mac are basically the same as the ones that run Windows."
Wednesday
norton torres posted a discussion

Accurender for Mac

hi... I thinking to move to mac, I know that autocad for mac is here but accurender it will come for mac..??? the moving for mac is more speed, power and resolution so my question is accurender will come for mac soon..???See More
Wednesday
Peter Milner replied to Wallace Amorim Júnior's discussion An interior attempt (if you know what I mean)
"The main problem you've got is that you are relying almost completely on indirect lighting. This takes a lot longer to resolve than direct lighting. If you can introduce some interior light sources it will help to reduce the graininess."
Tuesday
Alfons Akamp replied to Rich Rosemann's discussion Comotion
"Diese Probleme habe ich leider auch und schon öfters nachgefragt nach einer neuen Version von Comotion. Leider ohne Erfolg. Vielleicht reagieren die jetzt."
Monday
Rich Rosemann posted a discussion

Comotion

Has anyone been using Comotion for nxt lately.  I havn't loaded the program in some time and decided to try it again.  The Comotion 2.0, build 013, loaded fine using running DEMANDCOMO.VLX (following the steps required to run the program) . When I ran the command COMONXT twice,  I received the error: No function Defination: DCL_PROJECT_LOAD.  To bad.  Has the program been updated to run with nxt or has it been shelved.  Any update Daniel?WIN XP64, Autocad 2010,  latest nXT version.  See More
Sunday
NeilPhilipNebrija posted photos
Feb 27
Enrico Gheno replied to Enrico Gheno's discussion problem with textures distribution
"Thank you very much Roy, I will try these setting"
Feb 25

© 2015   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service