AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Hi, Roy, I need your advice about the settings of the translucent plastic or glass, to reproduce the "Barrissol effect".

On the pictures, I show you the faces only tagged as area lights, 10 or 20 cm behind the faces tagged as thin plastic or glass objects. The light is given by LEDs, but is not uniform.

Thanks.

Views: 1249

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You'll need to try some things.  I would start by placing area lights behind the panels, and making the panels using glass with roughness.  This should work better than making the panels themselves the light sources-- this light would be uniform in this case.  Try to limit the number of light sources if possible (it may not be.)

Let me know what you get or if you want me to take a look at a model.

Thanks Roy, That's what I was trying, but I need to put some "glow" on the glass. I would like that the glass glowes, just with the area lights, but I am at the beginning of the experience. In case, I send you the dwg, if you have some time.

Attachments:

Thanks Mario, for your advices, I'll try all these way. I'll post the result.

Put 6 smaller light sources behind the screen.  Gave the screen some thickness for better refraction by copying and offseting the surface.  Changed the screen material a little-- IOR 1.6, Roughness 1.0, Transparency .85, -- no glow.  Until you're convinced that you can't adequately model this physically, avoid all tricks such as glow or those that Mario is suggesting.

e1, BTW.  This stuff isn't working well with e4-- I need to make some changes here.

roughness is set to maximum i see, is there a way to make the material more diffuse? Maybe changing the distance between light source and screen or is there no place left? Is there any change by tagging the lights as omnidirectional or diffuse?

Not really, no-- but you can change the shape and configuration of the light sources behind the screen.  I did these quickly for illustration only.  I also only let this run for a minute or so-- things should smooth out a bit after a while.

Thanks a lot Roy. When I offset the surface, is it to simulate a solid, so do I have to tag the both as "thin", or not? The effect that my customer is looking for, is the case of the bigs disks at the ceiling. Something like this picture, but with the better lighting effect that you obtain. 

No-- don't tag it as thin.  

I increased the distance between the sources and the screen for this one.  It also uses e4 plus a tiny bit of glow to simulate the sub-surface scattering of the material which we are not going to calculate (it would take forever).  You won't be able to use e4 for yours yet, I had to make some changes here since the glow isn't working.

Put the glow in a separate channel so you can easily adjust it.  Don't get carried away with it, it is "cheating".

Thanks Mario, the illumination looks very good. I'm going to take a look on your file. Thanks for the time you spend on it.

Thanks Mario. I see, with your help, that omni light are better for this case. And my question to Roy: Why? What is the difference in the functioning betwen area or diffuse, and omni? The "area" picture is not finalized, but its enough to see the difference...

The omni light distributes light equally in all directions.

The area light distributes light based on its direction vector (straight down by default-- but an editable setting).  The light is only distributed in one hemisphere and the intensity decreases at glancing angles using the cosine with respect to the direction vector.

Thanks a lot Roy. I understand, now, why the light is stronger in the space between two surfaces (close enough) tagged as omni, but not in the case of the area light.

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Cesar Montero posted a discussion

USING THE TRIAL VERSION BUT CRASHES WHEN I OPEN MORE THAN TWO DRAWINGS

Hello,I've been using the trial version at work but it crashes when I have more than 2 drawings opened in Auto cad while running a rendering. Is anybody having the same issue? I'd like to know if it is a nxt issue before buying the original.Thanks,CesarSee More
Friday
Judith Klein replied to Judith Klein's discussion NXT Settings - Was ist das? - what´s that?
"Hi Roy, is it possibel to send me the file in Version 2007? Best regards, Judith."
Wednesday
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Judith Klein's discussion NXT Settings - Was ist das? - what´s that?
"I've looked pretty closely and haven't been able to find anything wrong with the drawings or the algorithms.  It's definitely having trouble with the lighting in this model-- I did the following: Changed the beam angle on the…"
Tuesday
Alfons Akamp replied to Judith Klein's discussion NXT Settings - Was ist das? - what´s that?
"Da bin ich mal gespannt. wa da heraus kommt."
Sep 17
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Judith Klein's discussion NXT Settings - Was ist das? - what´s that?
"It's not a units issue, they're ok. I'll let you know soon what I've found."
Sep 16
Judith Klein replied to Judith Klein's discussion NXT Settings - Was ist das? - what´s that?
"Hi Thorsten, Ich habe DDUNITS eingegeben und da sieht man, dass die Einstellung in mm ist. Wenn ich dann ein Licht einfüge, kann ich nicht sehen, was das für eine Einheit ist. Deswegen versteh ich nicht, was ich da und wo ich da was…"
Sep 16
Thorsten Hedrich replied to Judith Klein's discussion NXT Settings - Was ist das? - what´s that?
"Hi Judith, soviel ich verstehe, meint Roy einfach nachzuprüfen, ob die Einheiten, mit denen die Lichtquellen eingefügt werden (mm,cm,m,inches...) auch den verwendeten Einheiten in Deiner AutoCad Zeichnung entsprechen. Dazu einfach in der…"
Sep 16
Judith Klein replied to Judith Klein's discussion NXT Settings - Was ist das? - what´s that?
"Hi Roy, maybe my english isn´t well enough because I don´t know what you mean with "use the _DDUNITS command.  Make sure the insertion scale matches the actual units in your model."  My Settings in ACAD are…"
Sep 16

© 2016   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service