AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Hi, Roy, I need your advice about the settings of the translucent plastic or glass, to reproduce the "Barrissol effect".

On the pictures, I show you the faces only tagged as area lights, 10 or 20 cm behind the faces tagged as thin plastic or glass objects. The light is given by LEDs, but is not uniform.

Thanks.

Views: 1278

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You'll need to try some things.  I would start by placing area lights behind the panels, and making the panels using glass with roughness.  This should work better than making the panels themselves the light sources-- this light would be uniform in this case.  Try to limit the number of light sources if possible (it may not be.)

Let me know what you get or if you want me to take a look at a model.

Thanks Roy, That's what I was trying, but I need to put some "glow" on the glass. I would like that the glass glowes, just with the area lights, but I am at the beginning of the experience. In case, I send you the dwg, if you have some time.

Attachments:

Thanks Mario, for your advices, I'll try all these way. I'll post the result.

Put 6 smaller light sources behind the screen.  Gave the screen some thickness for better refraction by copying and offseting the surface.  Changed the screen material a little-- IOR 1.6, Roughness 1.0, Transparency .85, -- no glow.  Until you're convinced that you can't adequately model this physically, avoid all tricks such as glow or those that Mario is suggesting.

e1, BTW.  This stuff isn't working well with e4-- I need to make some changes here.

roughness is set to maximum i see, is there a way to make the material more diffuse? Maybe changing the distance between light source and screen or is there no place left? Is there any change by tagging the lights as omnidirectional or diffuse?

Not really, no-- but you can change the shape and configuration of the light sources behind the screen.  I did these quickly for illustration only.  I also only let this run for a minute or so-- things should smooth out a bit after a while.

Thanks a lot Roy. When I offset the surface, is it to simulate a solid, so do I have to tag the both as "thin", or not? The effect that my customer is looking for, is the case of the bigs disks at the ceiling. Something like this picture, but with the better lighting effect that you obtain. 

No-- don't tag it as thin.  

I increased the distance between the sources and the screen for this one.  It also uses e4 plus a tiny bit of glow to simulate the sub-surface scattering of the material which we are not going to calculate (it would take forever).  You won't be able to use e4 for yours yet, I had to make some changes here since the glow isn't working.

Put the glow in a separate channel so you can easily adjust it.  Don't get carried away with it, it is "cheating".

Thanks Mario, the illumination looks very good. I'm going to take a look on your file. Thanks for the time you spend on it.

Thanks Mario. I see, with your help, that omni light are better for this case. And my question to Roy: Why? What is the difference in the functioning betwen area or diffuse, and omni? The "area" picture is not finalized, but its enough to see the difference...

The omni light distributes light equally in all directions.

The area light distributes light based on its direction vector (straight down by default-- but an editable setting).  The light is only distributed in one hemisphere and the intensity decreases at glancing angles using the cosine with respect to the direction vector.

Thanks a lot Roy. I understand, now, why the light is stronger in the space between two surfaces (close enough) tagged as omni, but not in the case of the area light.

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Ian Stevenson's discussion Rendering in greyscale only
"Here's some of the original documentation:  Assigning Materials to ACA Components nXtRender materials are just AutoCAD materials with some additional data attached to them. If you use AutoCAD Architecture (ACA) you can attach an…"
1 hour ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Ian Stevenson's discussion Rendering in greyscale only
"Make sure ENABLEPROGRESSIVEUPDATE is 0 (it should be).   The big one is to make sure you are assigning materials to ACA components.  There used to be some nice documentation on this but it appears to be gone-- I'll see if I can drum…"
1 hour ago
Ian Stevenson posted a discussion

Rendering in greyscale only

I have downloaded a 30 day trial of Accurender as I wish to get back in to it after a 'render break'. Is there a restriction on the 30 day trial as objects drawn in Architecture appear to have the materials mapped when in model space but only render in greyscale.Other 3D objects such as 3D solids render. Is there a setting that I am missing or is this disabled in the trial version.Thanks in anticipation of a response.See More
11 hours ago
Daniel Hargreaves replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"Can you post a small DWG file, with one object, path & target that causes the crash. "
yesterday
Alfons Akamp replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"Hi DanielI am working under Win7 64 bit and currently have the Opendcl version 8.1.3.1. Hallo DanielIch arbeite unter Win7 64 Bit und habe zur Zeit die Opendcl Version 8.1.3.1."
Sunday
Daniel Hargreaves replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"I couldn't get the error to repeat. When you first launch AutoCAD, type OPENDCL at the command prompt and tell me which version you have."
Sunday
mike makki replied to Jelena's discussion i do like the easy way with nxt
"sorry Jelena they don't do here spot the difference competition...:)"
Saturday
Yinka Gbotosho commented on Peter Milner's photo
Thumbnail

HiRise brochure 2016 02a

"This is great Peter. Congratulations on a job well done."
Saturday

© 2017   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service