AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Using nXt version 348...

When inserting legacy plants, they appear in plan (and 3d) very small, not showing the true limits of the plant size as were shown in AR4. See attached image...same plant.

Is there a way to overcome this? Maybe resolved in latest version?

Thanks for your help,

John

Views: 46

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Rendering, side by side, showing they are same scale.

Attachments:

Looks like it's just missing a branch level when it's represented in AutoCAD under nXt-- probably by design to reduce the complexity of the AutoCAD blocks.   The trunks look identical.  No-- I don't think there's any facility in there to change this behavior.  

10-4...Thanks for the quick reply Roy.

May end up loading all (well...maybe not all, but at least some favorites) the legacy plants/trees using AR4 into a file for transfer into newer environments.

John

Actually, it's the nXt plants/trees that are affected by this more profoundly.

See attached image files....Just use old copied plants/trees?

John

Attachments:

Yep-- just checked-- it doesn't look like there's a setting for this.  I'm sure I did it to simplify the blocks inserted into AutoCAD.  It obviously doesn't work very well for some plants.

Will make do...copying insertions of plants from older projects.

Thanks again Roy,

John

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Steve Wojtynek replied to Steve Wojtynek's discussion Material Library "Slides"
"Figured it out...  I went into Windows File Explorer and double-clicked on one of the PDF icons with an ArMaterial name underneath.  Windows told me it didn't have a program assigned to open that file format, so I browsed to…"
12 hours ago
Steve Wojtynek replied to Steve Wojtynek's discussion Material Library "Slides"
"Nope... Rebooted a bunch of times since "successful REGSVR32".  Large, Medium, and Small Icon Views all show PDF icons with the names of the ArMaterials underneath.  The AR5 installation on my old computer (that died) worked…"
13 hours ago
Peter Milner replied to Peter Milner's discussion Render farm OS
"Thanks for that Roy. I'll give it a go tomorrow."
13 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion Render farm OS
"It's a little hard to say weather the bottleneck is the limit I'm imposing on the number of threads created or something else. ******** AR Studio is not too far from production ready-- but let's test the thing first on your new farm…"
14 hours ago
Peter Milner replied to Peter Milner's discussion Render farm OS
"So the original render farm having 4 nodes with 20 cores each, doesn't have a problem (although they still only max to 80%). Whereas the new server farm has three machines with 40 cores each and therefore underperforms. Correct? So, what would…"
15 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion Render farm OS
"Looks like there's a 32 core hard coded limit in the legacy product.  AccuRender Studio doesn't have this limitation."
16 hours ago
Peter Milner replied to Peter Milner's discussion Render farm OS
"My local machine bounces up and down from 29% to 100%. The main renderfarm actually bounces from 5% to 75% (not sure why I got a different reading yesterday). I generally render with the Path Tracer engine which has a different pattern of processor…"
21 hours ago
Rich Hart replied to Steve Wojtynek's discussion Material Library "Slides"
"Try switching the View to something like Large Icons: I've also had people say they've had to reboot before the change took effect. Try that."
yesterday

© 2017   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service