AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Rafina house near sea

Views: 167


You need to be a member of AccuRender nXt to add comments!

Join AccuRender nXt

Comment by George Ioannidis on April 26, 2012 at 12:26am

One way to produce nice grass (or fur, or hair, or even fallen leaves or anything randomly and unevenly found in real world) - using particles or something (which is common place e.g. in Blender) - would be nice. But as far as I know AutoCAD does not support particles. I would say there may be workarounds for architectural stuff like this - things that people making Architectural renderings could need or like to have. Maybe some sort of "block spray" for "painting" surfaces with randomly scaled, oriented and rotated block of e.g. grass blades or leaves (from 2,3 or 4 alternative blocks for even more randomness). Nxt works quite well with model with high polygon numbers, so it wouldn't be a real problem to render scenes like that. I did some internet search and found lisp routine which can fill closed polyline with blocks.Unfortunately it works only with planar shapes, so it can't fill real surface. Gives some interesting results though and maybe of some different use. If you do a block of grass blades with applied material on it, you can gen something like this:

Model becomes really heavy and difficult to handle or navigate though. I think similar (and rather better) result can be achieved using nXt groundcover.

Comment by Yinka Gbotosho on April 25, 2012 at 5:49pm

I agree with you George. NXT is a fantastic program. I however wish we had more support with entourage and ready objects and perhaps routine for making fur, hair, grass and such like we have with Max and vray. What do you think?

Comment by Miguel Tano Adanes on April 23, 2012 at 2:50am

Really nice job George! Very effective representation!

Comment by George Ioannidis on April 23, 2012 at 1:56am

Thanks Marc. Working on this project (rendering part) I have found nXt to be mature product, delivering quality I like and need, its speed is good (I am not doing animations and am not professional renderer as well - so speed is not really a problem for me). Of course all this must be considered in conjunction with the price. And there are not many programs today (if there are any at all) which can deliver all that nXt does in such price level. Happy nXt-ing to all :D

Comment by Marc Chaumier on April 21, 2012 at 12:43pm

Nice Pictures George. I like the render when we see one side in the shadow and one in the sun. It's good with nXt plants. But when you have to put real plants in Pshop, it's more difficult cause you have to find plant with the same lighting, and in most of the case it don't correspond. This kind of exposition can give the most beautiful contrast, and subtility in the shadows areas, as we can see here.



Latest Activity

akinlolu olugboji commented on Maciej's photo

view 002 mx2

"Good catch."
16 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Albert D Hart's discussion Fractal Trees vs Images for trees
"nXt doesn't really work like that-- all of the objects need to be taken.  An object which is hidden from view may show up in a reflection, a shadow, refracted through glass, contribute to diffuse reflection of light in the scene, etc..…"
17 hours ago
George Ioannidis commented on Maciej's photo

view 002 mx2

"One oddity: nice green leaves of summer together with some melting snow islands on the grass and elsewhere. Except the tree is some kind of evergreen which I can't recognize. ;)"
Steve Wojtynek replied to Albert D Hart's discussion Fractal Trees vs Images for trees
"Sounds like good method... something I need to look into as I've never used tree images. Assuming I want to continue working the old way using only fractal trees... Does AutoCAD and AccuRender take time to calculate trees hidden by buildings…"
kingjin commented on Maciej's photo

view 002 mx2

"Maciej, hello, very good results, and ask how to get the car? THX."
Albert D Hart posted a discussion

Fractal Trees vs Images for trees

"I'm usually rendering fairly detailed AutoCAD architectural models on 3Dmodeled sites with lots of AccuRender trees and shrubs.  I was wonderingwhat AccuRender 4 (using Acad2004) and AccuRender nXt (using Acad2011)actually "sees" when you select a view to render.  Do they "see" and have to"consider" the 50 trees behind the building (adding a lot of calculatingtime to a rendering), or do these programs "hide" and never consider thestuff that's hidden in a view by other entities?"Everything in th…See More
Maciej posted photos
J. Raul Cardenas replied to J. Raul Cardenas's discussion Render Settings
"8.6 MPixels is a lot indeed, specially in rendering time. Thanks a lot for the explanation, makes sense now."
May 19

© 2015   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service