AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Is there any way to  change the normal of the groundcover's grown plane?

I just tried applying it to a vertical surface but, though it works, the leaves they are always growing in the Z-Vector direction.

 

Views: 1276

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I just tried to copy an existing groundcover and in the leaves tab I set the angle value to 90. It seems to work!

Attachments:

thanks Miguel, but it's not exactly the same effect, since leaves position is still calculated over the Z-Axis

Try applying it to a 3d solid.  Let me know.

It works!

Is it possible to get the same result for mesh objects? : )

Yes, works better!

When I try on doing the kind of plants that "hang" for elevated planters, balconies with a touch... I generate a 3d solid which is an extrusion of the desired front view of the element as I decided it to "populate". Then, I explode the 3D object and delete all faces that should not show. 

I apply an "invisible material" to it and then proceed to attach the groundcover. It works wonders for some distances depending on the detail level. Also, if you wish to play around a bit, this method is very useful when you need shaped foliage, like the kind we desire to have aside any fence, edging a curb or even as filling over medium sized grass areas. It's a little tricky to set accurate scaling (for me, I reckon).

We tend to use pre-done plants which are sort of dioramas. They are good but usually the result must be "equalized" with the rendered image so they don't look "cartoonish" or faded. We copy a number of these entities to fill some areas. The groundcover is a very good tool.. trust me!. Take time to play with it and you'll never regret. One hint.. get yourself some crisp images to use as flowers and leaves. The better the source, the better final results.

Very interesting method. Could you please upload a couple of example images?

Ok, here are a few pics with more or less the process I explained. 

  This little model is what I use to setup my groundcover materials and I recommend everyone to create one in order to facilitate the custom materials creation process for two reasons: 1. the materials and groundcover SCALE may not be the same for every job (for me it changes all the time) 2. There's a lot of trial-error rendering until you get what's wanted. So, before proceeding to rendering anything in nxt, I make sure that the scale is as the models I'm used to deal with. If not, I use this test platform. 

  exc1. Here you see the desired shape drafted upon the planter's edge (keep in mind the UCS). If you look real close, you may see that the shape is not co-planar with the planter's wall. it's "shifted" a bit to avoid artifacts and produces a gap which also prevents undesired shadows or clipping.

  exc2. This is the extrusion. Notice that I make it HUGE!. The reason for this, is to facilitate undesired faces deletion. If you make it small, you waste a lot of time deleting small pieces.

  exc3. After EXPLODING the resulting 3D Solid, every single face turns into a REGION which works as surface for applying groundcover. Regions are cool, because they can be edited via boolean operations. I also create a top "cover" face using any method (i.e. 3Dface or region too).

  

Attachments:

exc4. This is the rendered model. After applying an "invisible" material to the region, assigning the desired groundcover and scaling adequately, you can see the result is very good and works wonders at certain distances (depending on the groundcover quality). I have left the "half donut" object I use for other purposes to illustrate the potential of the groundcover tool which in this case, is sort of a mulch for rocks. I always have water, walls, the half donut and the hanging plants in the model when creating new materials. I play with the scale a lot! specially because the water and the groundcovers depend on independently scaled images pretty much all the time. So, I find the desired scale WITHIN the testing model and then scale the project's model, matching both test and project to the wall thickness. 

  But this is just how I do it. I'm sure they are many other methods which work and could be simpler.

Attachments:

Ever tried this!

There are various problems related to it:

  • Trees easily grow very huge in size
  • It is difficult to set them up to stick to walls as in real life
  • Your model has to be accurate, normals facing the right direction etc, otherwise it would grow into the building
  • It creates materials with embedded textures

For that, try IvyGeneretor. George Ioannidis knows pretty well how to use it.

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Daniel Holz replied to Daniel Holz's discussion PBR Textures in nxtRender for Autocad
"Sorry, do not exactly how to do it right. If i sent you one or  sets, could you "compose" one material as an example? Maybe this is interesting for others too.."
Jan 2
Daniel Holz replied to Daniel Holz's discussion PBR Textures in nxtRender for Autocad
"Thanks Rich, exacvtly what i found out. Only did't know what to dfo with the AO map.."
Dec 31, 2025
Rich Hart replied to Daniel Holz's discussion PBR Textures in nxtRender for Autocad
"nXtRender doesn't use the AO texture image settings for anything, so don't bother trying to use that. I would start use the Diffuse textures at 100% and experiment with the levels of the Specular Reflection. You might need to toggle the…"
Dec 30, 2025
Daniel Holz replied to OYEBANJI EMMANUEL's discussion Questions for nxt render for autocad
"Hi,i imported some old Dosch 3D plants in nxtRender for testing, fully textured without an issue. Also used some free sketchup tree models (*.skp) from sketchuptextureclub and opened them in sketchup, exportet them to *.obj and used them in…"
Dec 29, 2025
Daniel Holz posted a discussion

PBR Textures in nxtRender for Autocad

Hi,Can anyone explaine how to use PBR textures in nxtrender for acad correctly?I like to use textures from sketchuptextureclub.This textures typicaly containing following types:- Diff- Displ- Norm- Spec- AOregards,DanielSee More
Dec 29, 2025
David Richards replied to Zdravko Todorovic's discussion nXtRender 0358-XE08 vs 0349-OA30 - What's new?
"Hello - there isn't an official changelog, mainly because the functionality is pretty much the same. Over the years we have fixed bugs that are reported and maintained compatibility with all released versions of AutoCAD. Please continue this…"
Nov 12, 2025
Zdravko Todorovic posted a discussion

nXtRender 0358-XE08 vs 0349-OA30 - What's new?

I'm considering upgrading my nXtRender from the very old arnxt64_0349-OA30 with AutoCAD 2008 to the new arnxt64_0358-XE08.Could someone please tell me what the main improvements, new features, or bug fixes are in the new version? Is there an official changelog available?See More
Nov 11, 2025
OYEBANJI EMMANUEL posted a discussion

BATCH RENDERING FUNCTION

Good day, please does anyone know how the batch rendering function works in nxt render for autocad ?See More
Sep 10, 2025

© 2026   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service