AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Hi, I have a question to ask, excuse me show indoor effect should use what kind of lighting form? Preset lighting da is less than ideal effect.thanks.

Views: 226

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Check this out!

peter_milner_sample_office

Use one of the two presets.  If you want to combine daylighting and artificial lighting see here.  Attach images or provide more detail if you want more specific comments.
Thank akinlolu olugboji and Roy Hirshkowitz, I'm learning indoor lighting effect, so want to consult, also asked you more guidance. This is my simple simulated indoor illumination, use is indoor illumination presupposition, whether want to express the nature, the true indoor effect require at indoor acquire artificial illume, natural light unhittable?

Place a 3D face over the window opening, assign a clear material to it, tag it as thin and daylight opening.

Then choose Interior with Daylight as your set up.

Then render for about 100 passes.

If you post the model here I'll have a look at it for you.

Here's what I get.
Tagging the object as a daylight source is unnecessary.  The interior daylight preset will take care of it.
Hi, Peter Milner, hello. Your indoor diagram is I want to study effect, my English is not good, you mean I didn't understand, I try to still cannot reach you have shown that indoor effect, is it convenient for you to the relevant parameter Settings screenshots show me? Or take your this file sharing, so I can download and try to do it, thank you.
Here's the model.
Attachments:
And here's a Pathtracer version.
pathtracer version could arise  a  tremendous  amount of  dots  ,It would take  a  unbearly  time  to  a  wanted picture ,oftenly ,I do not apply firstly.
Yes it takes longer, but the results are more realistic.

thanks . and the passes have a differently algorithmic  pattern   ,compared with  unpathtracer rendering.

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Maciej replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"Roy, thanks for your tip. It works - ca 48 minuts per 1 pass instead of 65... :)"
30 minutes ago
heyuan replied to heyuan's discussion HOW TO HAVE THIS EFFECT BY NXT RENDERING?
"I have received the email file, thank you!"
13 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"I'll take a look at it."
16 hours ago
Garret Diduck replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"Slightly off topic, but can we have the option of the Hybrid in the Plant Editor?"
16 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"My point is that it may be faster if you use another engine-- try the Hybrid."
16 hours ago
Maciej replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"George, I used to use RPCs, but unfortunately last time I have some problems to install this software. I'll try again anyway. Looks it really could help. "
18 hours ago
Maciej replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"I use standard. As far as my experience is concerned, for my purposes is more than sufficient. The point is I need more views, and this I sent was just a "bonus" for the client. The developer was asked to show the landscape impact, and…"
18 hours ago
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Maciej's discussion Plant vs. rendering time
"Which engine?  The performance hit for using trees with the Hybrid (or Path Tracer) engine is smaller-- perhaps worth a try."
18 hours ago

© 2014   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service