AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Hi, I have a question to ask, excuse me show indoor effect should use what kind of lighting form? Preset lighting da is less than ideal effect.thanks.

Views: 270

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Check this out!

peter_milner_sample_office

Use one of the two presets.  If you want to combine daylighting and artificial lighting see here.  Attach images or provide more detail if you want more specific comments.
Thank akinlolu olugboji and Roy Hirshkowitz, I'm learning indoor lighting effect, so want to consult, also asked you more guidance. This is my simple simulated indoor illumination, use is indoor illumination presupposition, whether want to express the nature, the true indoor effect require at indoor acquire artificial illume, natural light unhittable?

Place a 3D face over the window opening, assign a clear material to it, tag it as thin and daylight opening.

Then choose Interior with Daylight as your set up.

Then render for about 100 passes.

If you post the model here I'll have a look at it for you.

Here's what I get.
Tagging the object as a daylight source is unnecessary.  The interior daylight preset will take care of it.
Hi, Peter Milner, hello. Your indoor diagram is I want to study effect, my English is not good, you mean I didn't understand, I try to still cannot reach you have shown that indoor effect, is it convenient for you to the relevant parameter Settings screenshots show me? Or take your this file sharing, so I can download and try to do it, thank you.
Here's the model.
Attachments:
And here's a Pathtracer version.
pathtracer version could arise  a  tremendous  amount of  dots  ,It would take  a  unbearly  time  to  a  wanted picture ,oftenly ,I do not apply firstly.
Yes it takes longer, but the results are more realistic.

thanks . and the passes have a differently algorithmic  pattern   ,compared with  unpathtracer rendering.

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Joseph Chan posted photos
Monday
Daniel Hargreaves replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"coMotion Build 015 is posted and ready to download. I think I found why Previews were not exporting. If you check the box, setup the file permitters and then click play, it should export the individual…"
Jan 13
Daniel Hargreaves replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"I do all of my testing in 2014... same issue. Originally programmed for 2009 (I think)"
Jan 12
Kevin Lockwood replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"I was running Acad 2015"
Jan 12
Daniel Hargreaves replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"I did some digging this morning and if "Export Preview" is checked, it is suppose to write the image files. But even in my simple test it was not. Possibly something to do with the newer AutoCAD. I will continue to look into it have it…"
Jan 12
Kevin Lockwood replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"I see how to get it to "play" the animation, but don't have controls to record/save the animation."
Jan 11
Kevin Lockwood replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"I realized after writing this post, that something was running in the background. I had it set for pngs, but nothing was in the destination folder. Whatever it was, took a while to do nothing. :) Off to run a much smaller test..."
Jan 11
Daniel Hargreaves replied to Daniel Hargreaves's discussion coMotion 2.0 014
"I think I did add in a Preview... at least the controls. I'll look into the output if it is not functioning correctly."
Jan 11

© 2017   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service