AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

For a simple Texture map bump, which direction is positive and negative? If the image has some dark spots and light spots (a flagstone pattern) and I want the dark spots to look pushed down, what to i set the bump at?

Views: 239

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Bump mapping really doesn't work that way.  It's a trick that's done with the surface normal, it's not an elevation or displacement map.  Areas of the map which are the same color, either light or dark, will appear flat.  Areas which change color will appear perturbed.

Entonces... Como saber si emplear valores positivos y/o negativos??

The surface normal, a vector perpendicular to the surface on the "eye side", gets altered based on something called the gradient of the map.  Gradient, in the case of a 2 dimensional map, is a measure of the change of the map with respect to the x and y axes.  The sign of the normal reverses that perturbation in both x and y.  The actual effect it has depends on the geometry of the surface and the lighting.  There have been reports as well that I'm not doing this consistently for all of the engines-- I haven't checked the code on this so it might be true.

Gracias por tan tan pornta rspuesta. Segun he visto: en Path Trace, los valores negativos hacen ver como valles las partes oscuras de un mapa, en Hybrid sucede lo contratio.... Saludos

So the "darker areas" on this .jpg wouldn't make much of a difference between positive or negative bump setting? Is this a case were I need a monochrome 2nd image map to get a deep displacement effect?

Attachments:

Best approach is trial and error.  Pick your engine and try a bumpmap.  Use a negative scaling if you want to reverse the way thing appears to pop-out or push-in.  You can often get close to what you're looking for.

Displacement maps can be very effective but they are costly in terms of calculation time and should probably be used sparingly.  They use the bitmap as height information-- dark areas are lower than light areas.  You can use color maps for these but it's often easier to control as gray scale.

i tried both ways and i couldn't actually tell from the rendering which way was better. I just made a displacement map for this pattern.

As a rule of thumb (because i don't think i understand it yet) when do you use a negative vrs. a positive bump?

There is no rule of thumb-- it's trial and error.  Use a negative number when it looks better.  Certain programs like Crazybump can help take some of the mystery out of it, but not all of it.  You're trying to somehow get gradient (or displacement) information out of a photograph-- it doesn't always work.

Te adjunto estos mapas, tal vez puedan servirte. El color azul es un mapa de normales. 

To put it short - black goes down and white goes up by positive bump parameter (eg. bump +0,5).

Is that what you've expected to find out?

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

George Ioannidis commented on Peter Milner's photo
Thumbnail

screend brochure 2019 05

"Those are all exceptional work, Peter! Congratulations!On this one only: bricks look big to me, but maybe I am wrong. Also some areas in shadow look still a bit noisy."
Wednesday
Peter Milner posted photos
Tuesday
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio for AutoCAD
"1-  On the Rendering Tab there is a popdown called Destination.  The option is called something like "Local Out of Process".  2-  No, installation will require admin access."
Oct 5
Mark Brinkman replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio for AutoCAD
"I am an old Accurender user. I now need to try and re-create some old images from old models. (about 20 years old) I have now downloaded Accurender Studio, and now work with AutoCAD 2016 and 2017 I have 2 questions related to Accurender Studio: 1)…"
Oct 4
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion AR Studio ground plane
"Yep-- the groundplane in ArStudio should be turned on in that case-- but you will get a rectangle which may need to be sized.  If it's not turning on, that's probably a bug."
Sep 26
Peter Milner replied to Peter Milner's discussion AR Studio ground plane
"Not to worry. I've just seen that ArStudio has its own version of a ground plane. It just doesn't translate the old nXt one."
Sep 26
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion AR Studio ground plane
"Sorry-- just got back into town last night.  Infinite objects aren't supported in ArStudio-- so yes-- the ground plane has to be represented by a finite object, in this case a rectangle.  You don't have to use mine, you can use…"
Sep 25
mike makki commented on Tibor K. Karsai's photo
Thumbnail

WestlakeV - Copy

"good image and nice montage... the only thing is that the sky is too blue ... a light colour and would make it perfect"
Sep 21

© 2019   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service