AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Roy/All,

Rendering a front elevation for a job sign...needs to be at high resolution.

I did test renders at 24"x12" at 150 dpi. All looked good.

Went for final 24"x12" at 600 dpi and was oddly colored (1-600.jpg attached).

Dropped down to 24"x12" at 300 dpi and was dark (2-300.jpg attached).

Finally went back to 24"x12" at 150 dpi and it looked normal (3-150 dpi attached).

The attached 1-600.jpg was reduced in size in order to attach (not sure if the 5mb limit is per file or total...i went with per file...may need to do over if too big).

All of the renders ran at least 6 passes.

All of the renders setting were the same except for the resolution.

Anyone ever experience this? I haven't....can't render at high resolution?

Using AccuRender 1.0.348, Windows 8.1 64 bit, i7-4790 @ 3.60 GHz, 16 GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745.

Thanks for your help...

John

Views: 384

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

There are no theoretical limits as far as I know.  You are rendering a whopping 124 million pixels which I wouldn't recommend just for sanity's sake-- but it should work.  My guess is it has more to do with the orthographic projection causing precision problems.  There won't be much you can do about this.  You can check by rendering a more ordinary perspective and seeing if it fails as well.  You may be able to simulate what you need by using a perspective with a long lens (this may trigger precision problems as well since the eye will need to be placed far from the model).  If it's what I suspect it is, any help you can give the thing by allowing the eye point to be closer to the model would be a good idea.

If the problem is the ultra-high res somehow-- sometimes rendering at a reasonable resolution and upsampling in photoshop gives adequate results.  Sign are typically viewed from further away so the added benefit of ultra-high res is often not worth the effort. 

Thanks for the prompt reply Roy....Always appreciate coming here for help.

I had considered the ortho to be the issue - I'll either set up a similar view with a distant camera or will just go with the lower res and upsize post render...and save some sanity.

Thanks Roy...

John

I had a similar problem a few months ago using the render farm software. The images came out almost black.

Roy found the problem and fixed it in an update.

I was only rendering a measly 58.5 million pixels.

Then maybe I need an update! Need to take a look...

Thanks Peter...

John

I'll look, but my recollection was that your issue was image editor related.  These are being saved directly to jpg. This may be a different problem so an update is unlikely to help.

10-4...Thanks again Roy...and Peter.

I'll give an update later after I try my options.

John

A few observations/questions:

See attached images/image names for comparison.

All settings remained the same except for the "Density" (DPI).

"X" was set to 30 and "Y" was set to 9; Lighting didn't change; Number of passes didn't change (except for one that went to 11).

Render Setting                                Image Outcome

9”X30”-10 PASSES-75 DPI              18.75”X5.63”-120 DPI

9”X30”-10 PASSES-150 DPI            37.5”X11.125”-120 DPI

9”X30”-11 PASSES-300 DPI            75”X22.5”-120 DPI

9”X30”-11 PASSES-600 DPI            150”X45”-120 DPI

Resized the attached images to the original intended outcome.

What's going on with the colors and brightness...and image size outcome?

Thanks for your thoughts...

John

Attachments:

Last file attached...had to reduce size.

Attachments:

The tone operator will be very fidgety at a low number of passes-- it normally takes a hundred or so for things to settle down.  Obviously something went very wrong at 600 DPI-- a whopping resolution of 5400 x 18000-- or more than 97 million pixels.

Thanks Roy...Guess we just need to let them run as long as time allows.

The high resolution one came about for a job sign and groundbreaking presentation boards need. We ended up just using 150 dpi at around 40 passes - worked out well. Mounted boards were 120"x40".

Thanks again,

John

Glad to hear it-- the 6 million pixels or so which this gave you should work-- provided people aren't too close to the sign.

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

N` Goraw posted a photo
Monday
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Douglas Thompson's discussion Accurender 3 + Acad ADT3 + Windows 10
"I really have no idea.  This software hasn't been supported for more than a decade.  Anything you can get to work will be fine from a licensing perspective, I just don't have much to offer you."
Oct 5
Douglas Thompson posted a discussion

Accurender 3 + Acad ADT3 + Windows 10

Wonder if anyone can help. At home I run Windows 7, at work I have Windows 10.At home I use Accurender 3 with Acad ADT3, installed by loading my old Accurender 3 disk, the  downloading the latest *arx file, which I see on my home computer is Accuren3_2000.Can I still download the Accuren3_2000 update from anywhere, and will it work with the office set up anyway? I have tried simply copying the Accuren3_2000.arx from home to work into the Accurender folder in the usual location, but when trying…See More
Sep 29
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to norton torres's discussion I GOT AN ERROR WHILE RENDERING IN AUTOCAD 2010
"I'm guessing it's the same problem.  nXt has to be present for a conversion to work properly with a drawing that has nXt data.  That's a known issue.  Converting using any other method probably will not work properly if…"
Aug 23
George Ioannidis replied to norton torres's discussion I GOT AN ERROR WHILE RENDERING IN AUTOCAD 2010
"I think Norton mentioned that he did the conversion using TrueView, not the AutoCAD itself. He is still on ver. 2010 I suppose, otherwise he could do renderings directly in 2018. Maybe TrueView isn't quite versionwise correct as regards to…"
Aug 21
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to norton torres's discussion I GOT AN ERROR WHILE RENDERING IN AUTOCAD 2010
"One additional thought.  A known issue when saving drawings to a previous version is that nXt must be loaded and running before you convert the drawing. Try the following: 1. Open your 2018 drawing in AutoCAD. 2. Start nXt by typing…"
Aug 1
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to norton torres's discussion I GOT AN ERROR WHILE RENDERING IN AUTOCAD 2010
"Interesting.  I'm not sure what I can do about it-- the oldest AutoCAD I have available for testing is 2013.  AutoCAD 2010 is actually 12 years old which is an eternity in software.  You can try sending me a simple converted…"
Aug 1
norton torres replied to norton torres's discussion I GOT AN ERROR WHILE RENDERING IN AUTOCAD 2010
"yes... is every 3d model that I I import from autocad 2018 to autocad 2010 and  it dosent matter that I convert the drawing  in trueview to dwg 2010 it continues the error, it happens this way, I open the drawing in autocad 2010 then I…"
Jul 31

© 2021   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service