AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Hi, I´m evaluating to buy another computer... which processor and motherboard recommends? I was thinking about Core i7 with 4 GB RAM memory... I suppose the video card is not very important, may be a PCI express with 512?

 

I´m working in an important design and need the new computer very soon, because the renderin is consuming a lot of time!!!

 

THANKS

Views: 276

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

(# of cores) X (clock speed) is a good first cut at a performance indicator.

 

For example:

 

4 x 2.66Ghz = 10.64

8 x 3.0 Ghz = 24

 

Expect the second machine to be more than twice as fast.

 

The video card is not very important for rendering-- it may be very important for AutoCAD and WalkAbout performance.

4GB RAM might not be enough. In our office we hve both 32bit computers w. 4GB and 64bit ones w. 8GB - it is not possible to render too complex models on 4GB ones

I don't think that is a ram problem. It is a limitation of the 32 bit machines OS.

I changed about two month ago to 64 bits, now is better than with 32 bits but I  think that if you are going to work with big models you need at least 8 GB.

In my models with over 1.000.000 faces, the RAM used increases to 1,24 gb. but the dual processor is ever at 100%... I think that a bigger quantity of RAM and a better processor may help, but I must to change the OS too.

 

 

I´m reading info about AMD and Intel, comparatives between Intel Core i7 950 and AMD Phenom X6 1090. In some websites says that AMD is better for rendering, and in others, says that Intel is the best. The price of AMD is lower than Intel...

 

http://www.chw.net/foro/procesadores-f34/602501-i7-950-vs-phenom-x6...

 

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/146?vs=100

I use both AMD and Intel machines here.  Not much difference, as far as I can tell.

I would agree, I have used NXT on both AMD & Intel machines the difference has much more to do with number of cores and the clock speed. I would encourage you to get 8mb or more ram. If you are doing large models it will help with regen time in AutoCAD while building as will a better video card. Video cards should be build for the purpose of graphics not gaming though, I would recommend something in the Quattro line or the FireGL line.

Video cards should be build for the purpose of graphics not gaming though, I would recommend something in the Quattro line or the FireGL line.

How about intel graphics bundled with most boards?

I'm sure you all have seen the current advertisements for computer systems and video cards.  Everyone pushes toward gaming systems.  It seems that no one uses computers for anything else, or so we are lead to believe.  I don't remember the last time I saw an advertisement for systems pushing Cad requirements other then Boxx or XiComputers and some other specialty systems, I'm sure.  It's tough for me to decide on video card upgrades.  Processors are easy, as Roy has noted -- high processor speed and many cores -- more or less.

 

Rich Rosemann

 

 

 

If you go to Autodesks website and look at the listing of certified video cards for the current software you will be surprised what is supported and what is not.

It doesn't take a big expensive open GL cards to get good performance any longer.

I got a big Quattro card a few years ago that was a top end card ($1,200.00 US) and it isn't even supported any longer. It does seem to work but is not supported by Autodesk.

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Thorsten Hedrich replied to Daniel Holz's discussion PBR Textures in nxtRender for Autocad
"Since there is no Ambient Occlusion Slot in 'Texture Set' Mode of the nXt-Material Editor, I found another way around what to do with AO Maps: Baking it into Diffuse; e.g. Multiplying AO Map over Diffuse/Albedo/Colour in…"
Thursday
OYEBANJI EMMANUEL commented on OYEBANJI EMMANUEL's photo
Thumbnail

V1x copy

"Thank you so much. I appreciate your kind words."
Apr 7
Thorsten Hedrich commented on OYEBANJI EMMANUEL's photo
Thumbnail

V1x copy

"The wooden texture of the TV-Console looks quite decent. The Wallpaper on the left has an interesting structure, maybe it would look even better, if you make the texture seamless + applying a little bit of depth, e. g. with highpass - filter in PS?"
Apr 6
Thorsten Hedrich posted a photo

thalasso_spa_sw

- little closer to what we thought of -
Apr 1
Thorsten Hedrich replied to Thorsten Hedrich's discussion OBJ Plant Issue - Diffuse Maps
"Thank you for help on this topic! Will test 'Automesher LT' (developed by Automapki), if I run into troubles again. [Sometimes I was wondering about, if this forum is still alive... .]"
Mar 22
OYEBANJI EMMANUEL replied to Thorsten Hedrich's discussion OBJ Plant Issue - Diffuse Maps
"Good day, I searched the former forum posts and found another option to solve this  problem which is another plugin to autocad-----AUTOMAPKI.  You can give it a try."
Mar 21
Thorsten Hedrich posted a photo

Thallasso_Pre_Study_2_50mm

3ds +obj import works for older files-'xfrog-plants', for instance... .Comments + Critics appreciated!Hopefully accurender still survives!
Mar 4
Thorsten Hedrich replied to Thorsten Hedrich's discussion OBJ Plant Issue - Diffuse Maps
"Found 'Textured Mesh Support' only works with obj and 3ds Files which do not contain PBR Maps. To 'obj' converted newer 3ds do not render in nXt :-("
Feb 21

© 2026   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service