AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

I'm working on a project where I am rending a shade structure that I want to composite onto a site photo. I've set a ground plane and tagged it as alpha channel, but what I get isn't how I think it should look. I'm not getting any transparency in the shadow (well, just a tad maybe).

I've done this in the past and I think all my settings are about the same. What am I doing wrong??

Samples: (Click to enlarge)


Image while rending. I think the items tagged as alpha used to show here, but I cant remember for sure.

Render window shows some transparency, but not what I would expect

When rendered without tagging the ground plane as alpha, shadows look pretty normal.

Compositing in photoshop... ick!

Composite using render on ground plane not tagged and using sky alpha, masking using materials channel, and masking just around the shadow. Desired look with a lot more work to get it.

Views: 458

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I think it's important that you assign a material to the ground plane similar to the photo you're compositing with.

I did a quick crude test with no materials assigned and you can see that the shadow is definitely the wrong colour. However I do get the transparency, though probably too much.

This one is purely rendered with a background image (no Photoshop involved).

This is rendered with background image and then composited in Photoshop.

Rendering with the background image gives you the opportunity to adjust the lighting and perspective of you render to match the surroundings.

Sahara table. Brand-new stuff from Sven Christiansen Peter? :D

 

Nice paradigm with explanation. Thanks.

Edit the mask channel in PhotoShop so you get more transparency-- simple brightness adjustments will probably work fine.  When compositing make sure that the color your compositing with is darker (black, for a start).

I did try using a material similar to the photo I was matching, but not with the background, as Peter suggested. I'll give that a go. I also used a solid background, but should have gone darker as you suggested, not lighter.

 

This is one I did when alpha compositing was first introduced. Worked great for me back then :)

That one worked as is because you're compositing with white.

 

The visible background you use while rendering is not relevant-- other than it may effect the exposure of the image-- which can be reset using the Brightness setting.  (Reflective backgrounds may be important-- depends on the image.)  (Peter is probably right in that it's easier to adjust things if you see everything at the same time.)

 

******

 

When compositing you have complete control.  You can save off as many mask channels as you want in the image editor and edit them independently.  You decide what colors to combine using photoshop, not the rendering background.  The renderer encodes how much occlusion there is into the alpha channel when creating those shadows-- it's just a guess though (there is no way to really do this)-- and you may need to adjust the shadow portion of the mask channel.

 

If you want to include the nXtImage of the thing I can take a run at it.

There's definitely something wrong with the alpha channel objects in the more recent builds--  I'm looking into it.
Thanks Roy. I tried all the tips given above and was getting the same results. Thought it was just me :)

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

George Ioannidis commented on Peter Milner's photo
Thumbnail

screend brochure 2019 05

"Those are all exceptional work, Peter! Congratulations!On this one only: bricks look big to me, but maybe I am wrong. Also some areas in shadow look still a bit noisy."
yesterday
Peter Milner posted photos
Tuesday
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio for AutoCAD
"1-  On the Rendering Tab there is a popdown called Destination.  The option is called something like "Local Out of Process".  2-  No, installation will require admin access."
Oct 5
Mark Brinkman replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio for AutoCAD
"I am an old Accurender user. I now need to try and re-create some old images from old models. (about 20 years old) I have now downloaded Accurender Studio, and now work with AutoCAD 2016 and 2017 I have 2 questions related to Accurender Studio: 1)…"
Oct 4
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion AR Studio ground plane
"Yep-- the groundplane in ArStudio should be turned on in that case-- but you will get a rectangle which may need to be sized.  If it's not turning on, that's probably a bug."
Sep 26
Peter Milner replied to Peter Milner's discussion AR Studio ground plane
"Not to worry. I've just seen that ArStudio has its own version of a ground plane. It just doesn't translate the old nXt one."
Sep 26
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Peter Milner's discussion AR Studio ground plane
"Sorry-- just got back into town last night.  Infinite objects aren't supported in ArStudio-- so yes-- the ground plane has to be represented by a finite object, in this case a rectangle.  You don't have to use mine, you can use…"
Sep 25
mike makki commented on Tibor K. Karsai's photo
Thumbnail

WestlakeV - Copy

"good image and nice montage... the only thing is that the sky is too blue ... a light colour and would make it perfect"
Sep 21

© 2019   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service