AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Hi guys, as you know i think path trace is the way to go if you have enough time to resolve noise, at least for interior images, the main problem is that if I change from path trace to packet trace  (to reduce time) I need to change all the materials that have reflections, (almost all of  them)  because I got as a result  materials that look OK in path looks odd (sometimes terrible) in packet trace , I see this specially on glass, floor materials as marble, wood, ceramics, etc.

Which is the best approach to deal with this problem?. Maybe two different set of materials?

 

Any ideas will be trully aprecciated

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Alejandro

 

 

Views: 146

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Can you show us an example of the difference.

Packet tracer takes much longer to resolve reflective materials. Maybe you need to let it run longer.

If I need to do a quick render, I use packet tracer and set as many materials as possible to glossy.

It may be a good idea to have two material libraries; one for accurate materials and the other for speed rendering.

Thanks Peter,  maybe that´s the point ,  I stopped twice and image started with packet trace because  the preliminary results (about 15- 20 passes) was really odd. I think always as packet trace to speed up some images and for exterior shots.

One question, do you save both drawing versions, one for packet trace and one for path trace?

 

Regards,

 

Alejandro

No. I usually decide beforehand whether it's a quick rendering or a slow one.

Maybe there is an argument for saved colour schemes as there are with lighting.

Exactly - some sort of "material schemes" as back in AR4 would help greatly...

Or to have general switch(es) to disable certain functions/procedures in rendering (like "no procedures", "no textures" switches...)

Or to have each material divided into two (low and high detail) and to have a switch, that would choose if a particular rendering will use LD or HD material definitions...

This would be real time saver...

What about a switch on the material that changes reflectivity to glossy when rendering with  packet tracer.

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

ebenezer attah koomson posted photos
7 minutes ago
James Bloomer posted photos
May 1
Roy Hirshkowitz commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

c3

"No license yet. Send some results when you can-- might be easier as a forum post instead of this comment section."
Apr 7
Roy Hirshkowitz commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

c3

"The drawings are likely scaling correctly-- don't scale the geometry please. These are only display units for the arstudio interface."
Apr 7
Maciej commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

c3

"You were right, Roy. It was about the file name - ash on my head. ARStudio seems to be very ok for my humble interiors' purposes. One minor point (see attached) - meters or millimeters only, what about centimeters? I need to scale all my…"
Apr 7
George Ioannidis commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

g2

"Yeah, I know, usual situation. :)"
Apr 7
Roy Hirshkowitz commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

c3

"Looks like there's no file name.  Try saving the drawing to a file first, then run ArStudio.  This is a bug, obviously.  Thanks."
Apr 7
Maciej commented on Maciej's photo
Thumbnail

c3

"I followed all the instructions and that is what I see now...Life is a struggle... Is there something I did wrong? AutoCAD 2013, nXt 0358-SG17, Windows 7"
Apr 7

© 2020   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service