AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Hi, Roy,

I think that we need a "logo" for the identity of nXt, and a specific icone to put in acad. Can you provide it to us, or start a little "competition" to find it. The winner could get 2 centuries without desease, a travel to seattle to shake your hand, or ... his head in our hall of fame!

Views: 92

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'm not sure I've got time for an official competition-- but if anyone would like to submit some ideas we can take a look at it. You'd be immortalized in the product.

We defnitely need logos both for a platform independent nXt and for AccuRender nXt (the AutoCAD version.)
I don't think about me, but I'm sure that some nXt users are the men of the situation. Nevertheless, I will try to do something... to be immortalized.
Might be good to know some more about the product. for example, what is the official name? nXt or Ar5?
It's still up in the air. So far "AccuRender nXt". The platform independent piece is "nXt"

Kevin Lockwood said:
Might be good to know some more about the product. for example, what is the official name? nXt or Ar5?
Hi Roy,
Is there any, more specific, timeline for platform independent nXt? Will it include software for other OS like Linux or for other CAD packages only?

Roy Hirshkowitz said:
It's still up in the air. So far "AccuRender nXt". The platform independent piece is "nXt"

Well don't talk to much, let's get started. Here is the first attempt. Am i immortal now? ;-)

I like it-- kind of like an XBox game.
I like this flash... and so we could have nXt alone, and nXt + Accurender. But I'm not a "green" addict, maybe in blue? Immortality is very close...
Maybe something like this?
But hey, this is supposed to be a teaser, i want to see more and better.

Yes, blue is better, for me, and italic give moving effect, nice, the path of the light tracer, right in our eyes. If it can help, I've made a study in 3D, but only to give some idea, nothing serious...
Attachments:
Fun. It's a holiday here-- I'll run these by Bob and Scott tomorrow...
Did these 2 this morning before I realized I missed the brand name Accurender.

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

J. Raul Cardenas replied to J. Raul Cardenas's discussion Render Settings
"8.6 MPixels is a lot indeed, specially in rendering time. Thanks a lot for the explanation, makes sense now."
Tuesday
akinlolu olugboji replied to mike makki's discussion my entry animation for cg competition at www.cgarchitect.com
"Awesome work, just can't help wondering why so many sheep are let on their own without a Shepard, also on the Patio, with so much leave movement which I believe is due to wind, it is unaffected be the burning fire. "
Tuesday
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to J. Raul Cardenas's discussion Render Settings
"No-- nothing to do with darker or lighter.  It does define resolution by dots per unit-- for example 36" x 24" at 100 dpi will provide 3600 x 2400 rendered pixels (8.6 million).  It's exactly the same as specifying 3600 x…"
Tuesday
J. Raul Cardenas posted a discussion

Render Settings

Under Render Settings>Passes>Print one have the option to select the size of the paper to print the rendering by using the X and Y and units, the question is:The Density, by default is 100, in a printer it is related to how much toner the printer use to make the final print darker or lighter, Is this the same concept in nXtRender?I've been using 8.5x11 and I need 24x36 print and wondering if I need to increase the density. Thanks to anybody who can respond.See More
Tuesday
Maciej posted a photo
Monday
Maciej posted a photo
May 16
mike makki posted a discussion
May 15
Maciej posted photos
May 15

© 2015   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service