AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Hello friends, I propose a competition of free participation in order to enhance and share the best knowledge of all the members of this community nxt. The idea is this: that each who wishes to participate, use a 3D model which is on the internet and imported into AutoCAD and nXt render it compared to other renderers on the market. Ideally, this project Roy Hirshkowitz take as their own, and be who ruled what is the best job with nxt. The format of the competition could be like this, which should include a brief explanation of the settings used.
Roy do you think?

Views: 306

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I certainly don't have time for something like this.  After the Flamingo release, it's possible that McNeel might.  Comparing nXt to other renderers directly is asking for trouble-- I wouldn't recommend this as a format for a competition.

Ok Roy, the idea is exposed, obviously you who you have to be assessed properly, perhaps with a different format would be much more effective ... but I think it would be a good way to see the potential for nxt ...

Best Regards.

to me this looks like nonsense...

  1. rendering time, editing time - how to take these into account?
  2. how long does it take to make changes - how to take that into account?
  3. ....

...pointless.

The idea of a rendering competition is great-- but like you point out-- direct comparisons between products are very difficult.

yep. My first thought was: "just send me a dwg and let me show how good nXt could do this" ... then I started thinking it over. IMHO there are too many variables, the use of a product is too complex... direct comparison would always be inaccurate and thus pointless.

I agree, I recognize the difficulty of assessing renders comparison with others, certainly not the best format for a competition. Would welcome any competition format to allow forum users learn to use the best possible settings ..., and later power envelopes on our work ...

I think it's a positive idea ...

I believe one good method is to have an exterior or interior scene which can be used as a basis to do a render. The Camera Angle would be same and it will basically come down to the usage of Light/Texture/etc settings.

Sampdoria, I think this would be a good option, as it will extrapolate and compare the best render settings, opening a debate constantly improving the software ....

a greeting
...

AccuStudio hosted several "competitions" like this some years ago. Link.

A model was provided that only only had a view set (no materials or lighting). We had the option of adding entourage and lighting. Entries are submitted and posted in the Gallery. Viewer could then vote on the images and after a set time frame, voting is closed and a "winner" announced. 

I'm sure we can still do this. Maybe even easier now with the "new" website. Let me know if interested and I can setup the space.

in order to promote the increase of the overall knowledge of nXt, rules of such a competition should incorporate that anyone who enters it will provide all details - lighting setup, material definitions...

So waiting for a model. Hopefully Architectural - for what Nxt is mostly used here!

Then also the need to have categories, like day and night exterior entries, natural or artificial or combine interior lighting entries.  

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Todd Dodd replied to Todd Dodd's discussion Missing material assignments
"If you use a custom display configuration for rendering, go to the display manager, in the left window click on the plus button to expand your custom display config, and click on "model".  On the right hand side of the window select…"
3 hours ago
Todd Dodd replied to Todd Dodd's discussion Missing material assignments
"The problem appears to be in the Display Configuration.  i created a display configuration for "Rendering" or "Accurender" which used to work well.  the materials now render correctly in the out of the box…"
3 hours ago
Todd Dodd replied to Todd Dodd's discussion Missing material assignments
"Here is the cad file.  I had to dump a lot out of it to make it small enough to posted but the result is the same.  The wall does not render with the brick material that is assigned to it.  Does anyone know what i am doing wrong?"
4 hours ago
Garret Diduck replied to Jeff Waymack's discussion Mapping materials to xrefs
"There are two ways you can set the orientation for a material without having to create multiple materials. Both are located in the material tab on the right side. MaterialMap is actually an AutoCAD command to set the mapping type, but it will also…"
5 hours ago
Jeff Waymack posted discussions
5 hours ago
Jeff Waymack replied to Jeff Waymack's discussion Mapping materials to xrefs
"Hey Mike...the idea of a material for each roof worked just fine. Thanks!"
5 hours ago
akinlolu olugboji replied to Jeff Waymack's discussion Mapping materials to xrefs
"Either mapping or material my xref'ing always comes out file as it was in the reference drawing."
6 hours ago
Todd Dodd posted a discussion

Missing material assignments

I have a file that I rendered IN ACA 2014, using an older version of NXT, not sure how to tell which build I used.  I then got a computer upgrade and tried to run a rendering of the same file using ACA 2014 and a newly purchased version of NXT, not sure which version on this one either.  The rendering rendered correctly on my old machine, but on the new machine the ACA walls, doors and windows are all grey.  I tried to attach my cad file and rendering images but I exceeded the 5mb limit so I…See More
7 hours ago

© 2014   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service