AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Hello friends, I propose a competition of free participation in order to enhance and share the best knowledge of all the members of this community nxt. The idea is this: that each who wishes to participate, use a 3D model which is on the internet and imported into AutoCAD and nXt render it compared to other renderers on the market. Ideally, this project Roy Hirshkowitz take as their own, and be who ruled what is the best job with nxt. The format of the competition could be like this, which should include a brief explanation of the settings used.
Roy do you think?

Views: 326

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I certainly don't have time for something like this.  After the Flamingo release, it's possible that McNeel might.  Comparing nXt to other renderers directly is asking for trouble-- I wouldn't recommend this as a format for a competition.

Ok Roy, the idea is exposed, obviously you who you have to be assessed properly, perhaps with a different format would be much more effective ... but I think it would be a good way to see the potential for nxt ...

Best Regards.

to me this looks like nonsense...

  1. rendering time, editing time - how to take these into account?
  2. how long does it take to make changes - how to take that into account?
  3. ....

...pointless.

The idea of a rendering competition is great-- but like you point out-- direct comparisons between products are very difficult.

yep. My first thought was: "just send me a dwg and let me show how good nXt could do this" ... then I started thinking it over. IMHO there are too many variables, the use of a product is too complex... direct comparison would always be inaccurate and thus pointless.

I agree, I recognize the difficulty of assessing renders comparison with others, certainly not the best format for a competition. Would welcome any competition format to allow forum users learn to use the best possible settings ..., and later power envelopes on our work ...

I think it's a positive idea ...

I believe one good method is to have an exterior or interior scene which can be used as a basis to do a render. The Camera Angle would be same and it will basically come down to the usage of Light/Texture/etc settings.

Sampdoria, I think this would be a good option, as it will extrapolate and compare the best render settings, opening a debate constantly improving the software ....

a greeting
...

AccuStudio hosted several "competitions" like this some years ago. Link.

A model was provided that only only had a view set (no materials or lighting). We had the option of adding entourage and lighting. Entries are submitted and posted in the Gallery. Viewer could then vote on the images and after a set time frame, voting is closed and a "winner" announced. 

I'm sure we can still do this. Maybe even easier now with the "new" website. Let me know if interested and I can setup the space.

in order to promote the increase of the overall knowledge of nXt, rules of such a competition should incorporate that anyone who enters it will provide all details - lighting setup, material definitions...

So waiting for a model. Hopefully Architectural - for what Nxt is mostly used here!

Then also the need to have categories, like day and night exterior entries, natural or artificial or combine interior lighting entries.  

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Roy Hirshkowitz replied to S. Jaisimha's discussion Bump map for material
"I would stay away from displacements for this-- they will impact performance way too much. This is going to require a combination of mapping and materials to really work.  nXt can get the size of the bitmap from the material definition, that…"
Wednesday
S. Jaisimha replied to S. Jaisimha's discussion Bump map for material
"Thanks for replying George. I tried a displacement map, but I am having serious trouble getting the map to sit right. Is there any example for nXtRender anywhere that I can follow? Will one single material with a displacement map work immaterial of…"
Wednesday
George Ioannidis replied to S. Jaisimha's discussion Bump map for material
"I think that for that type is better to use displacement map. Displacement actually modifies the geometry rather then just fake the relief."
Wednesday
S. Jaisimha posted a discussion

Bump map for material

I want to create multiple materials with different bump maps, so that they can be assigned to the objects in AutoCAD for rendering. Please see the attachment for an idea. The idea is to assign the appropriate one to the object for rendering.If this can be achieved, it will avoid a whole lot of symbol creation, since right now to get the design etching, we are creating individual symbols for each design. Obviously this is very time consuming and results in literally thousands of DWG files, one…See More
Wednesday
Wallace Amorim Júnior replied to Wallace Amorim Júnior's discussion Download NXT
"That works. Thanks, Albert Hart."
Jul 27
Albert D Hart replied to Wallace Amorim Júnior's discussion Download NXT
"Try this direct link for the current 64 bit   nXtRender - May 2015 OE08: arnxt64_0354-OE08.exe"
Jul 27
Wallace Amorim Júnior posted a discussion

Download NXT

Hi, guys.I had problems with my computer and I had to buy a new one. I lost many files and had no backup of nxt installer. I came to try download again, but the page is empty.What can I do to be able to download it?Thanks.See More
Jul 27
Peter Milner commented on Peter Milner's photo
Thumbnail

fulcrum brochure 2014 08

"If you mean Field of View, I have it set to 50."
Jul 27

© 2015   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service