AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Gentlemen,

I work on a residential scheme, and there are hundreds of trees to be placed.

I have created a few with Plant Editor, and, regreteably, rendering time was about 40min for 1 pass (res 1920x1080 which is not hires at all..)

Is there any relation between Ar Plant (ie complex, standard or wide tree, level of branches, number of leafs, etc., etc. - to find the right balance between rendering time and tree quality?

Any help appreciated.

Attached:

1. Aerial View 

2. trees I have created with leaf bitmaps

Views: 487

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I think there isn't a rule of thumb as an answer to your question, Maciej. It mostly depends on what you are trying to achieve. As I can see, your rendering is aerial picture taken from bird's perspective, i.e. from very long distance. Any detailed trees aren't really distinguishable from that far, so maybe it would be good idea to use low res trees for the most distanced and slightly more complex for the trees in foreground. Though I doubt it could be noticeable at all, even at higher resolutions. As an alternate solution, did you tried to use RPC trees instead of AR plants? RPCs give quite acceptable results in such situations.

George, I used to use RPCs, but unfortunately last time I have some problems to install this software. I'll try again anyway. Looks it really could help. 

Which engine?  The performance hit for using trees with the Hybrid (or Path Tracer) engine is smaller-- perhaps worth a try.

I use standard. As far as my experience is concerned, for my purposes is more than sufficient.

The point is I need more views, and this I sent was just a "bonus" for the client. The developer was asked to show the landscape impact, and some man's eye height views are to be prepared.

But I will try simple (standard) trees.

My point is that it may be faster if you use another engine-- try the Hybrid.

Slightly off topic, but can we have the option of the Hybrid in the Plant Editor?

I'll take a look at it.

Roy, thanks for your tip. It works - ca 48 minuts per 1 pass instead of 65... :)

Still seems slow for this.  Displacement maps? For the grass perhaps?  Could be a memory issue as well.

Well, it may be. I do not use a special workstation, acad-dedicated...  :)

However, without trees works pretty nice, just seconds per pass... No displacement map, just coloured bitmap for whole site plan applied as decal, simpe houses, no stuff indoor. 

My guess is all trees are far to complex for this view: 5-6 levels of branches, 7-8 buds, 4-5 leafs on bud...   It doesn't look easy, does it? 

As a comparison, here's one I've done last year at 4000x2400 resolution using 635 trees and plants (from the acurender nxt tree library)+ a few RPC shrubs. Time for 1st pass: 15m:27s (standard engine). I also tried at your resolution 1920x 1080 : 3m:43s for first pass. I think it might be a memory issue as Roy was thinking.

Attachments:

Fantastic work Francoise! Absolutely fantastic. One of the best bird's eye perspectives here!

What is that pitch black material on the roofs if I may ask? Some kind of Canadian tiles absorbing all the light? ;)

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Thorsten Hedrich posted a photo

patio_lapidarium

Lightning_Test2
Nov 1
OYEBANJI EMMANUEL replied to OYEBANJI EMMANUEL's discussion IMPORTING 3DS AND OBJ FILES WITHOUT LOSING THEIR TEXTURE MAPS
"Good day Sir, I am using a trial version of nxt render for autocad. Please i imported the 3ds file but when i render it doesnt show the materials. The material balls are there with their textures missing but upon re-loading their textures, the…"
Oct 30
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Paula Suarez's discussion Led Lights - Iluminação indireta
"Some of the engines do a better job than others with these.  The Hybrid engine in nXt work pretty well.  AccuRender Studio should handle this sort of lighting very well, with little to no performance penalty."
Oct 13
OYEBANJI EMMANUEL replied to OYEBANJI EMMANUEL's discussion IMPORTING 3DS AND OBJ FILES WITHOUT LOSING THEIR TEXTURE MAPS
"Thank you, Mr.George for the solution. I very much appreciate it."
Oct 2
George Ioannidis replied to OYEBANJI EMMANUEL's discussion IMPORTING 3DS AND OBJ FILES WITHOUT LOSING THEIR TEXTURE MAPS
"OBJ file doesn't care bitmaps, only the UV coordinates of each face. 3DS files can hold bitmaps externally along with the proper UV mapping coordinates. Just keep bitmaps in the model's subdirectory. You can import 3DS file using 3DSIN…"
Oct 2
OYEBANJI EMMANUEL posted a discussion

IMPORTING 3DS AND OBJ FILES WITHOUT LOSING THEIR TEXTURE MAPS

Good day everyone,Does anyone know how to import obj and 3ds files into autocad without having the models lose their textures ?I have imported so many but they dont come with their textures.See More
Sep 29
Paula Suarez posted a discussion

Led Lights - Iluminação indireta

Por favor , há anos que não consigo uma solução... Eu preciso de uma orientação sobre como proceder para representar iluminação INDIRETA em sanca de gesso.Não temos mais a antiga opção de Linear Light que já existiu no Accurender. Então como fazer? Me sugeriram aplicar omnidirectional light em vários cilindros pequenos para simular isso, mas convenhamos, além de não ser prático , é muito ineficaz e irreal porque a luz fica manchada em partes ao invés de um facho linear que conseguíamos fazer no…See More
Sep 28
OYEBANJI EMMANUEL replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio
"Thanks a lot. It's now working. I appreciate Roy for the heads up."
Sep 20

© 2022   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service