AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Hello team

 

Wanted to first of all thank everyone for responding quickly to my queries especially Roy and Peter.

 

I started out working on Exteriors on an experimental basis with Ar3 in my other hand for finallized work but I had not expected to generate final work from Nxt so soon, and I have!

 

I must admit I like a lot of new things in Nxt

- The loading model situation is gone! Now the model is there on demand

- I must admit the non-stop render engine seems bizarre but its actually really good!

- I love the save Tif with Alpha option

- I like the environmental settings and options

- The Material Editor is tricky and it will take some work to get the imported AR3 materials to run smoothly but seems positive

 

Some tricky things which will take some getting used

- Setting a Cam in CAD and using that in Nxt was tricky but it a quick learn

- Moving around  with invisible arrows (mouse pointer) is tricky in Walkabout but I think I got the hang of it

- The Plants editor is really tricky and Im still trying to figure out how to resize the plants.

 

Attached is a raw render image.

 

Cheers

Views: 232

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

very good for the first raw rendering:-)

That's an excellent starting point.

Maybe just let it run for a few more passes to smooth out the shadowed areas.

Very good start Kamal. For exterior renderings (yes, 99.99% of my rendering work are exteriors :) ) I use path tracer rather than the other one (default). I actually like its granulated "photographic" look.

Nice work. I agree with George.  I'd love to see this one with the Path Tracer.  (It may take quite a while to resolve the interior spaces but it should add some nice detail to the rendering such as better lighting under the roof overhang.)  Turning on caustics for the pool surface, in conjunction with the Path Tracer, may add some nice effects. 

 

Try it if you have the time and patience.

tx all,  also for the tips. Sure, I will try what you guys recommend.

 

Hi guys

 

Here is a Re-Render with Pathtracer on and Caustics turned on for the Pool.

 

I let it run during the weekend and it notched up 11200 passes. Definately more clarity and ambiance. I believe Roy, via caustics, you were expecting reflection of the water onto the canopy above? Maybe because the sun is coming from behind the house, it didnt reflect it on the ceiling. I will try another sun angle. So far I'm enjoying Exterior Renders which seem to be much easier and realistic to render so far. I am not using the lush green lawns like most users on Nxt because this is  desert country! :)

 

Attachments:
I think there is really no compare point between the two images isn't it? :)
You ended up with some beautiful caustics on the concrete floor of the swimming pool-- those nice bright patterns.

Much better.

I find that reflective materials need to be toned down under path tracer.

exactly - the glass on pathtracer looks too dark

To Sampdoria: on packetTracer version, did you turn the "Indirect" switch on?

Generally speaking of the overall appeal of the image I like the packettracer version more than the pathtracer one - pathtracer looks generally overlit, there is less smooth transitions from light to dark and also the bottom side of the roof overhang looks very very overlit... 

Surprisingly to me, there are completely different shadows on the surface of the swimming pool - as sun direction seems to be the same, why is it so? I would not expect that much of a difference... the same goes to patches of the light on the floor of the central volume - packettracer does not show them at all while pathtracer does...

Hi Ros, thanks for the inputs. I am not sure if I remember if the Indirect was on. Also, Im sure, I must have moved the sun around a bit  since I was experimenting with the shade/shadow aspect of the model.

 

You are right, the original render engine has some pros as well.

 

Peter, when you say 'toned down' - how so technically speaking, reduced refelctivity etc?

comparing both images, shadows (the volume on the left) look the same - but that does not explain why do we see two shadows over the swimming pool on the first image and one on the second... and it also does not explain why do we see bright areas on the floor of the central volume on the second image only...

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Chad Kauffman posted a discussion

Licensing Issues

Upgrading a couple of machines and also switch a user profile. I need our current license code to update. Thanks,See More
18 hours ago
Kevin Lockwood replied to MES's discussion Animation using WalkAbout in CAD.
"Its been years for me too.  I think Daniel spent some time getting CoMotion running again.  http://www.accustudio.com/marketplace/comotion As to stitching frames, the tool I used to use wasn't working last time I tried, but I did…"
Saturday
Rich Rosemann replied to MES's discussion Animation using WalkAbout in CAD.
"Is CoMotion no longer being updated?"
Nov 11
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to MES's discussion Animation using WalkAbout in CAD.
"Sorry you're not getting a better response here-- our animation stuff is pretty rudimentary.  Hoping someone will still chime in though.  I haven't looked at this stuff for such a long time, my guess is that the software I used…"
Nov 8
MES posted a discussion

Animation using WalkAbout in CAD.

Hi,I want to create a "fly thru" or "walk thru" animation using Nxt in CAD 2015.  Anyone has experience with this and would like to share how to use it? Any important tips?Thank you!See More
Nov 7
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Enrico Gheno's discussion Perspective between 3D model and background image on NXT autocad 2015
"There are a couple of ways to do this-- In nXt the WalkAbout window allows you to insert and manipulate background images and your viewpoint independently.  You can either allow nXt to composite the image for you, or save the thing with a…"
Nov 4
Enrico Gheno posted a discussion

Perspective between 3D model and background image on NXT autocad 2015

Hi, I would like to insert my 3D model on an image in background, obviously with the correct position, size and perspective lines.Is there a method to move the 3D model to adapt it at the image in background?At the moment i can only try to setting the position of my 3D model with the Autocad camera and launch the render to control if the position is correct, but it's impossible to find it. I must render my 3D model and put it in my image with Photoshop. Not a great result.Look down here, the…See More
Nov 3
Peter Milner replied to Peter Milner's discussion RenderFarm passes and tasks
"Hi Rich, That could be the answer. We have a new designer working at one of our other sites and she may have started a drawing from scratch instead of using a template. Therefore it would be set to use the standard rendering engine. Thank you for…"
Oct 22

© 2019   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service