AccuRender nXt

advanced rendering for AutoCAD

Hello team

 

Wanted to first of all thank everyone for responding quickly to my queries especially Roy and Peter.

 

I started out working on Exteriors on an experimental basis with Ar3 in my other hand for finallized work but I had not expected to generate final work from Nxt so soon, and I have!

 

I must admit I like a lot of new things in Nxt

- The loading model situation is gone! Now the model is there on demand

- I must admit the non-stop render engine seems bizarre but its actually really good!

- I love the save Tif with Alpha option

- I like the environmental settings and options

- The Material Editor is tricky and it will take some work to get the imported AR3 materials to run smoothly but seems positive

 

Some tricky things which will take some getting used

- Setting a Cam in CAD and using that in Nxt was tricky but it a quick learn

- Moving around  with invisible arrows (mouse pointer) is tricky in Walkabout but I think I got the hang of it

- The Plants editor is really tricky and Im still trying to figure out how to resize the plants.

 

Attached is a raw render image.

 

Cheers

Views: 232

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

very good for the first raw rendering:-)

That's an excellent starting point.

Maybe just let it run for a few more passes to smooth out the shadowed areas.

Very good start Kamal. For exterior renderings (yes, 99.99% of my rendering work are exteriors :) ) I use path tracer rather than the other one (default). I actually like its granulated "photographic" look.

Nice work. I agree with George.  I'd love to see this one with the Path Tracer.  (It may take quite a while to resolve the interior spaces but it should add some nice detail to the rendering such as better lighting under the roof overhang.)  Turning on caustics for the pool surface, in conjunction with the Path Tracer, may add some nice effects. 

 

Try it if you have the time and patience.

tx all,  also for the tips. Sure, I will try what you guys recommend.

 

Hi guys

 

Here is a Re-Render with Pathtracer on and Caustics turned on for the Pool.

 

I let it run during the weekend and it notched up 11200 passes. Definately more clarity and ambiance. I believe Roy, via caustics, you were expecting reflection of the water onto the canopy above? Maybe because the sun is coming from behind the house, it didnt reflect it on the ceiling. I will try another sun angle. So far I'm enjoying Exterior Renders which seem to be much easier and realistic to render so far. I am not using the lush green lawns like most users on Nxt because this is  desert country! :)

 

Attachments:
I think there is really no compare point between the two images isn't it? :)
You ended up with some beautiful caustics on the concrete floor of the swimming pool-- those nice bright patterns.

Much better.

I find that reflective materials need to be toned down under path tracer.

exactly - the glass on pathtracer looks too dark

To Sampdoria: on packetTracer version, did you turn the "Indirect" switch on?

Generally speaking of the overall appeal of the image I like the packettracer version more than the pathtracer one - pathtracer looks generally overlit, there is less smooth transitions from light to dark and also the bottom side of the roof overhang looks very very overlit... 

Surprisingly to me, there are completely different shadows on the surface of the swimming pool - as sun direction seems to be the same, why is it so? I would not expect that much of a difference... the same goes to patches of the light on the floor of the central volume - packettracer does not show them at all while pathtracer does...

Hi Ros, thanks for the inputs. I am not sure if I remember if the Indirect was on. Also, Im sure, I must have moved the sun around a bit  since I was experimenting with the shade/shadow aspect of the model.

 

You are right, the original render engine has some pros as well.

 

Peter, when you say 'toned down' - how so technically speaking, reduced refelctivity etc?

comparing both images, shadows (the volume on the left) look the same - but that does not explain why do we see two shadows over the swimming pool on the first image and one on the second... and it also does not explain why do we see bright areas on the floor of the central volume on the second image only...

RSS

Search

Translate

Latest Activity

Brittany Watson replied to Brittany Watson's discussion Groundcover Issues
"Hi Ben, You were absolutely right! I took over a computer that was previously used for rendering by someone else. The Accurender Plant Editor was on the desktop and used as the primary plant editor, so I assumed it was the only one. Thank you so…"
May 18
Ben Mixson replied to Brittany Watson's discussion Groundcover Issues
"Hi Brittany, I have two different plant editors. The Accurender plant editor that installed with Accurender Studio and the NXT plant editor that installed with NXT for Autocad. Only the NXT for Autocad version lets you open, modify, and save…"
May 14
Brittany Watson posted a discussion

Groundcover Issues

Hello,I am hoping to get some clarity on how to modify and add groundcover. I have searched everywhere on the forum and online to find how to save a plant as .ArGroundcover, but I cannot find anything. I am using AccuRender Plant Editor and once I finish editing the plant that I want to use as a groundcover, I click "save plant as", but all it allows me to save as is .ArTree. I have a deadline to get this render finished, but I cannot for the life of me figure this out. See More
May 14
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio
"Thanks, I'll check on the first two.  The third is normal behavior-- data conversion stops when the arstudio data is detected.  There is a command to remove the arstudio data which would allow you to start from scratch-- probably not…"
Apr 19
Peter Milner replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio
"Two things don't seem to translate from nXt: Procedural bump and orientation of texture in a material.   Also, if a decal is changed using nXt, Studio continues to display the original decal. Editing the decal in the Studio material pallet…"
Apr 19
Peter Milner replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio
"That sorted it - using the Studio camera and then selecting "Get AutoCAD view"."
Apr 19
Roy Hirshkowitz replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio
"Interesting.  ArStudio has its own WalkAbout-like feture, it's the little camera button.  If you do it while the preview is running you should see the view changes automatically in the rendering."
Apr 19
Peter Milner replied to Roy Hirshkowitz's discussion AccuRender Studio
"I'm having trouble getting the desired view in Studio. I've tried setting the view in nXt walkabout and then using that to set the AutoCAD view. However, when I render from Studio, it gives me something different (see images below)."
Apr 19

© 2021   Header image courtesy Peter Milner   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service